How Long For Grecian Formula To Work

Arkeon and Gianni Leone journalism "Noantri" Their opinion

The Case Arkeon to date have been expressed and still express the different voices: the alleged victims, alleged perpetrators, witnesses, alleged victims of other alleged seven, students and scholars suspected of sectarian and religious phenomena, osservatori terzi, giornalisti. A questi recentemente si è aggiunta una nuova voce, appartenente si direbbe all’ultima categoria: il signor Gianni Leone della testata "MondoRaro".

Devo ammettere che, non avendolo prima mai sentito nominare, ho cominciato a conoscerlo solo da quando ha cominciato a scrivere di Arkeon.

Gianni Leone è intervenuto una prima volta con un articolo sulla "psicosetta" Arkeon , che in effetti non aggiunge nulla di nuovo a quanto già si sapeva: una lunga introduzione sul concetto di psicosetta (abbastanza vaga e inconsistente), seguita dalla dichiarazione di un’opinione personale certamente interessante ( “secondo la mia opinione Arkeon è a psycho-sect ") even if not supported by any argument, ending with a summary of a story (the indictment of 10 people Arkeon) a month and a half old (actually not even report the date of events) .

a second time and spoke with an article on the request for trial of a teacher accused of rape Arkeon ( "It looks like trouble for the cult" The Sacred Path ", which promoted the" method Arkeon " are far from a solution. The prosecutor in Milan John Polizzi has requested the indictment of the "master" xxxxx 67, accused of raping two women " ). The news, as it is reported, makes it seem that this is the umpteenth teacher caught red-handed, the last chapter in a sordid affair. Too bad that:

• the prosecution (and not minor detail) and private violence and rape;
• the news is even older than the previous one (as far back as July 2009, more than four months ago)
• the teacher is not called in yet another case but the first witness called in question appeared in all the famous TV shows, from which everything that followed;

But most unfortunate that Leo does not report the biggest news contained in the ANSA that image ... that:

• allegations related only to that teacher;
• allegations related only to two specific events;
• these events occurred not in a seminar but in his private residence

factors, those that show how the facts question does not concern either the "masters of Arkeon" neither "method Arkeon" but only the private behavior of a single person . A fact supported - and this is the last news that you forget Leone - excerpt from the position of this master from the largest trial of the other masters of Arkeon investigated. The news therefore confirms exactly what we go for years repeating many (teacher behaviors that do not relate to the group, I am indeed a betrayal) and the opposite of the view suggested by Cesap and apparently endorsed by Leo.

A third (and so far last) time Leone has intervened by publishing a letter from a student of Arkeon satisfied. Letter that, after an initial response that does not intervene in Friendly, followed by a lively exchange of comments posted on the Internet pages of the newspaper with the blogger Fioridarancio. Again Leone demonstrates that it is not very up to date on the facts (cites the closure of the Raffaella DiMarzio, in March 2008, lost, named Patrick, but also forgot to mention the re-opening nell’aprile 2008, ben 19 mesi fa). Il dibattito si conclude infine con un interrogatorio abbastanza surreale di Leone a Fioridarancio ( “Lei è per caso la moglie del fondatore di Arkeon?... lei è Patrizia Di Marzio? lei è una adepta o un adetpo di Arkeon?” ).

E’ curioso notare che il dibattito non si conclude per esaurimento, nè per una censura, ma in quanto a causa di “un problema al software sono misteriosamente spariti circa 40 commenti postati dagli utenti e dalla redazione. Ci scusiamo per il disagio, ma non sappiamo dare una spiegazione a questa “misteriosa” sparizione, che ha “colpito” anche la redazione” . Leone defines the disappearance "mysterious" (the quotation marks his), referring (I think) Arkeon assumption that someone was interested in the disappearance of an unwelcome debate. In fact, the disappearance appears misteriorsa, but rather because one would think that a newspaper has a back up of the site from which to retrieve the post (even I've got on this craft bloggetto). In any case, luckily someone Arkeon ( Peter) saved and republished the blog post , so we are convinced that the fact that after missing several days is just a matter of technical delays and certainly not of any complaint type.

must say that some doubts in this respect (censuretta) could rise to see the transparency policy adopted by Leo: After asserted the principle "freedom to post anonymously by users. Freedom not to answer on my part ", which tells Fioridarancio " or she is qualified or not will be allowed to post more comments "; choose to delete the links posted on his newspaper's supporters Arkeon ( the editors decided to black out, all those links that users enter, leading to sites that promote the method incriminated ") if it were a member of the world or a member of the Digos anti-cult and not a journalist who reported the information, perhaps to disassemble (for example on sito il caso arkeon il sito del cesap è linkato in diversi punti!).

Si potrebbe anche pensare che tale atteggiamento nasca da un pregiudizio di Leone contro Arkeon, un’indisponibilità a priori a valutare l’ipotesi che ci possa un pezzo della verità che non è nelle carte della Digos e che ancora lui non conosce…ma come pensarlo quando Leoni si limita a contestare “…le diarree mentali di un gruppo settario e per giunta sotto processo” e ribadisce che “I miei giudizi si basano su denunce e documenti e non su stronzate e deliri vari come quelli proposti dal “metodo Arkeon” ?!

Comunque, a tirar le fila, pur non condividendo Gianni Leone's ideas, I find that he / she will be able to say things more serious than being a rude-mannered person and a journalist from the information recently updated and very interested in exploring. Of course there is a serious issue still open: whether at least information that tells you (even if partial) really has or purports only. I am referring to when he asserts "I have a copy of the report of the Digos of 2008 and other documents. So I speak with documents in hand ... journalistically speaking, readers will form their own opinions and even when I will publish the next article on Arkeon, explaining more ... ". We hope that the article and that information finally come out, otherwise you might think that Leo publish outdated information because - not having their information - should expect to read in the papers of others. How do you say ... their opinion!

Tape Up And Fade Haircut

Today I found online an online journal that publishes an article critical of Arkeon . I mention it not because I find it particularly relevant, for good or evil, but because it seems an excellent example of the journalism heard that rages in the network. I quote here the exchange spoke with a journalist.
For those interested, I report on the same magazine, another intervention - I say delusional - which witnesses Jehovah's , in which I invite you to read the exchange with other readers. You will notice that the subject of the journalist to respond to criticism is always the same: "Do not faccamo comparisons that show the inconsistencies of what I say."
------

KLEE. Hi


In her article she gives a lengthy introduction on the concept of psycho "to get to say that in my opinion Arkeon is a psycho-sect, and certainly controversial with something unclear, gave himself that has been and is being of investigation.

It seems, however, that his definition of psycho is quite confusing. The concepts that you claim to be two elements of the standard psycho (indoctrination isolation) are in fact defined so vaguely that potrebberso fit (for example) the conversion of the saints and the cloistered life:
1) indoctrination: "total detachment from the old values \u200b\u200b(St. Francis who denies the richness and career of arms); submission methods and readings difficult to understand (he never read the Apocalypse of St. John?) encouraging respect for hierarchy and obedience, loyalty, adeguento the rules of the congregation (ca va sans say!).
2) isolation, "uprooting the family background of the subject (think of the nuns), remove their privacy and" confide " with other followers (think of the nuns), some psycho-sect then there is also a financial dependency (think of the nuns).

Also, when you also share his definition of a psycho, it seems thought the Scientology case, and seems to adapt very little to chance Arkeon that you take for example. It 'difficult to understand in fact what could be the insulation in a path based not on a community, but on a two-day seminars are held 3 or 4 times a year (as I have already expressed indoctrination).

This leads me to believe that what she calls his "opinion" on the case Arkeon is not based on knowledge diretta di Arkeon, ma più probabilmente su fonti indirette: probabilmente ciò che viene riportato da articoli di altri giornalisti o pareri di alcuni “studiosi” (per altro parte in causa nella vicenda Arkeon). Cioè la sua opinione sarebbe in effetti la loro opinione.

Forse ha letto anche gli atti giudiziari del rinvio a giudizio degli indagati di Arkeon e magari alcune testimonianze delle presunte vittime. Anche se questi vengono di solito chiamati fatti, in effetti non lo sono: un rinvio dice solo che l’accusa crede ci sia un reato e le testimonianze dicono solo che il testimone afferma delle cose…purtroppo la cronaca giudiziaria è piena di PM che prendono cantonate e di testimoni confusi o che dicono il falso. You can talk about facts when it comes to the end of a process. And even then only talking about legal truth.

Many journalists, in the three years since the beginning of this story, have lined up to explain to those who came before and what are the psycho Arkeon what they knew. Journalists and leading journalists on Sunday. If he wanted to make a different contribution and not just tag along, you may also try searching for evidence by the opposing party. Because the point is not whether there are seven or psiscosette: if the abstract idea is that there are facts has anything to do with individual companies that happen to us before our eyes, and that seems to look even. In If the court to read the site http://ilcasoarkeon.wordpress.com/


JOURNALIST
Hi, my articles
them sign and also my face. She criticizes my views remain anonymous. Legitimate choice is clear, however, if the object of criticism is what I write, you should make, at least for a form of courtesy ... Honestly
his speech and rhetoric for its own sake, do not see why you should make a comparison between Arkeon , Scientology and the Church. There are three different things and I find it inappropriate comparison. As it is decidedly at odds with Scientology, I never made any comparison with other groups, congregations or religious communities. In this
article speaks of Arkeon. If it operates on the subject there are no problems if he continues to make inappropriate comparisons, his comments will not be published.

What can I say? You are free to remain anonymous and to criticize my articles. But if he wants a response by the undersigned with respect to his claims, must be presented.
Sincerely.

KLEE
Mine is not a rhetorical intervention. I ask if - when he claims to have done a review in which he writes and publishes a magazine that his opinion - to clarify on what basis has made this view. Because from what transpires says that she probably has no direct knowledge but only indirectly to what he writes. And then I would understand if his sources are indirect printing (I say that he says they say ...) or have consulted some documents.

I would say instead of its article was rhetorical. Makes statements such as that already given, so vague as to be suits the most diverse situations. And when the third are some examples that just should not hit anything but well within its definition in order to highlight the generic, she says that is not relevant. If you do not agree on the merits, I will respond in the matter.

http://klee2009.blogspot.com

Tractor Cake Template

The family, the community and the Moro case Arkeon

"In a world where most people do a job not only unsatisfactory but also deeply stressful, with all its pressures, in a world where nothing is rarer than something that looks like a community, we unload all our needs on a report or expect that they are met by the family. And then we wonder if the relationship and the family come apart under so much weight (...) For tens of thousands of years no family has ever been self-sufficient. Each family had a functional unit, part of a larger functional unit that was the community - the tribe or the village. The tribes and villages were self-sufficient, not the family. And not just all worked together, but played, prayed together, so that the weight of the report, the significance was not confined to the family, especially a romantic relationship, but it was spread across the whole community. Until the Industrial Revolution, the family has always existed in that context. "

These words were written J. Hillman (one of the greatest living psychotherapists) and M. Ventura (writer, journalist) in their book interview in 1992 "One hundred years of psychoanalysis and the world goes ... getting worse. "

But this was also the proper sense of the collective work in Arkeon. What Peter sums up very well in his last beautiful post when he says: " But what made this job special for me was the fact that people and families are allowed to share with the others present that this fragility and beauty. Recognizing this as a gift. And an even greater gift, to share it. So the ceremonies. That for couples to whisper, say, at times shouting in tears, the love in public, winning a natural and modest embarrassment, had not the price. And what about those kids get up to heaven, in gratitude for life, to God and our families are back to Him? "

Arkeon was above all - at least for me - that space of intimacy between the people who created a community of people, but not blood. And I saw many families, married couples and parents and children and grandparents, who in that space could meet other people like them who through their own problems, sometimes showing them a chance to respond differently. A pedagogy through which people learned empathy for the language of love and life, as well as the children learn the language of words and share a desire for imitation.

At this I thought a few weeks attending the wedding of a young cousin. After a very simple and very beautiful ceremony, the priest called upon the altar of the four parents of the couple, explaining that the marriage was celebrated also thanks to them and asking them to leave their message to the newlyweds. Nobody expected it, least of all parents. The two mothers, as often happens, have accepted the challenge and were allowed to open one's heart with a few simple words of hope and responsibility, "we started 40 years ago ... now it's up to you." The fathers, as often happens, they have instead hidden in the silence his feelings, holding back from embarrassment.
Many have criticized the priest, so you should not embarrass the people ... and perhaps they also are right. But from my side I heard it differently. I heard that the priest had asked parents not to look at crowd the benches, but their children on the altar, to examine not the opinion of the people but the ingenuity of their children and to expose himself for some and for others, to make the community around them, to declare that two spouses do not but they are just one link in a long chain, which transcends his own family.
I feel sorry for the silence of those fathers who have not found a way to speak either for themselves or their children.
And I felt the destruction of the experience of seminars Arkeon, raw and imperfect as they were, as an affront to life and its possibilities.

In recent years I have often wondered how it is possible that people who knew all this could have ... Forgotten? These days I spoke with a dear friend of long standing that regardless of myself and other paths, she came to Arkeon years ago, with a teacher different from mine, I am fascinated by this experience. And after the events occurred, without denying anything of what was done, however, has developed a position that I think I can define it more bitter criticism. Bitter not because of the nature of work, as well as for the contradictions highlighted by his master in its own way of behaving in relationships. After a long telephone call to its final sentence was "... and these were people who had to take us somewhere?".
What I said, and I always thought, is that no one took anyone anywhere, but simply that everyone was using that experience to be on its way. And, indeed, precisely "the inadequacy" of some teachers - like his - were proof that the results were the fruits of labor of the students, not masters. Taking the phrase of the Gospel is still cited in the post of Peter: "Their faith saved them ...." In the seminars called "custody" and even if you said it was the award to the teacher, this was not the instrument ... the expectation being true to life. This does not mean that the teachers did not have a role ... but means that the fruits or absence of fruits for each descended upon himself by his own choice and that the shared experience became that opportunity that each gave to himself and to others, being able to transcend their personal history, they can decide whether to live a life shadow of its heritage and its justifications or live in the light of a future possibility to build, where the past is not a chain but the experience through which I made ready for tomorrow.

Free Lease Offer Letter Sample In Uk

These days the Italian press came out two extremely interesting articles, relevant to the Moro case.

The first, entitled "The psicologo: Moro non era un pauroso ”, è uscito su Avvenire e recensisce un libro dello psicologo Rocco Quaglia (“ Due volte prigioniero. Un ritratto psicologico di Aldo Moro nei giorni del rapimento ”, ed.Lindau) che rilegge le famose lettere dal carcere di Moro non in chiave storica o politica ma psicologica, per capire chi fosse il Moro prigioniero e quale fosse il senso delle sue lettere.
Per chi non avesse mai letto queste lettere, consiglio vivamente la lettura di un altro libro sulle lettere di Moro uscito un anno fa, “ Lettere dalla prigionia ” dello storico Miguel Gotor (ed. Einaudi) che tratta lo stesso tema in chiave squisitamente storica.

Il secondo, entitled " 'I boss, I tried to save Moro ", was published in L'Espresso and shows a shocking interview with the regret of the' Ndrangheta Francis Wells (the same man who recently revealed the case of vessels sunk off the nuclear waste South coast of Italy) that reveals how, at the request of the Christian Democrats, Aldo Moro tried the prison during his abduction - getting in touch with the Earthquakes, the bandwidth of the Magliana, Cosa Nostra, and even the Secretary Benigno Zaccagnini Dc - until he was asked to give up because " from Rome, politicians have changed their minds and say that at this point, we just stuffed our cocks .

These three sources together reveal a much shocking as accessible to everybody, not only on the operation of Italian politics and society, but also the dynamics of construction and / or destruction of a man, a project of a story.


The introduction to the book by Rocco Quaglia reported in (the book yet I have not read) dissects how the various politicians of the time - and behind them a large part of public input - has read the Dark letters on a key completely distorted. The insistent demand of the State and the Moro DC to start a negotiation for the exchange of prisoners was from time to time viewed as the result of failure of man to the fear of death or of the psychological conditioning of the captors. Already gotor's book shows that the request was politically sensible Moro, based on ample precedent in national and international politics and, above all supported by a polished argument, rational and subtle as ever, thereby dispelling the idea of \u200b\u200ba Moor "brainwashed". Gotor however, from serious historical and rigorous, explicitly said he did not wish to delve into this subject, not within its competence, and also explicitly choose not to penetrate in search of the responsibility for the death of Aldo Moro, not to open the sarcophagus of the many conspiracy theories recent history of Italy.

now lack is filled by the first book Quaglia, reviewing the content and tone of the letters, such as requests for confirmation of salvation Moro was not motivated by fear of death, to which it is indeed very free, but the care for that family of which he was central pivot. Affective family (wife, sons and his grandson Luke) and family policy (a DC in serious trouble at that stage). Its not a battle for their lives, but for the life of his family, his country and especially to the success of the political civilization and Christian has no doubt put the sanctity of life before an alleged and muddy "Reason of state". In that context
couple's divorce Moro by their party, accused of betraying him, but not to betray the soul and not to be neither democratic nor Christian. And in that context the response of mature DC, Mass publicly bare letters from Moro, chooses not to question itself, but his accuser, supported in many ways a picture of a man bent, brainwashed, confused, and then de-legitimization dignity and words. Moro is no longer he is no longer the same man. "This means the book when defines Moro 'twice prisoner' of the Red Brigades and the image of him was stubbornly common, namely a person unable to control emotions and prey instinct to survive. "
's book gotor agrees on this point and adds that the political and human destruction of Moro in the public eye was an explicit policy choice of the vertices and painful at the time, useful to lower the exchange value in negotiations with the Moro the Red Brigades in order to facilitate the release. A cynical and appalling choice, indeed, that not only makes a man dead Moro (a hostage without value is not killed but released), but mainly responded to the deepest questions of the soul Moro State destroying the request and the bearer . The passage that most

mi ha colpito della ricostruzione di Quaglia è però questo:“ Moro, dunque, si dichiarò «in piena lucidità e senza avere subito alcuna coercizione della persona». Protestò la sua completa padronanza di sé sia per favorire le trattative, sia per tranquillizzare la famiglia. La risposta del governo arrivò immediata e spietata: Moro è divenuto un altro, la prova è nella sua dichiarazione di sanità mentale”.

Questo è il passaggio chiave. Chi dice la verità, se la verità è inaccettabile, è semplicemente un folle. Il fatto che non lo riconosca è la dimostrazione che è folle. Così il cerchio si chiude, come un cappio , Around the possibility of Moro to survive. Whatever he says will have no value. And with him is cleared and made unreliable anyone who thinks like him, whether family, friends, colleagues, all apparently trapped in instinct to protect their loved one. And the message is clear to everyone around see and understand: "Without your cocks!"

This is - coincidentally - the advice given to regret the 'Ndrangheta who wanted to save Moro, as reported in the second article, which fills the second reticence of the book gotor. In particular, it confirms the suspicion, alluded to in the book without gotor overplayed his hand, which was abandoned and Moro volontariamente sacrificato da una parte del mondo politico di allora su un altare di convenienze vaste. Il punto chiave è quando il pentito - chiamato dalla DC per aiutarli a trovare Moro, entrato per questo in contatto con il Sismi, la banda della Magliana, Cosa Nostra e addirittura il segretario Dc Benigno Zaccagnini- quando si reca dal suo contatto ai servizi segreti per indicare il covo di via Gradoli si sente dire appunto di desistere perché “ da Roma i politici hanno cambiato idea: dicono che, a questo punto, dobbiamo soltanto farci i cazzi nostri” . Che questa sia la situazione lo conferma la dichiarazione di un appuntato che collabora alle ricerche, secondo cui “ Non distinguo più tra chi mi vuole aiutare and he who tries to get me going around in circles. In addition there is the political war, with the Socialists who want to live Moro, and most of the Democrats who pretends to want to leave . Surely there was someone who wanted to free Moro, and probably at the beginning they were not few ... but things changed when the government and Moro put the DC in front of his empty, the statue of Justice interpretation, when in essence the child said that the king is naked. Their rejection by Moro is explicit in the same letters Moro, announcing his immediate resignation from DC.

Because I talked about all this?

Why is a topic that personally interests me molto.

Perché è un tema importante per la vita collettiva nazionale.

E perché credo che sia sintomatico di come si possano manipolare e strumentalizzare l’opinione pubblica, sacrificando le persone, distorcendone le idee e distruggendone l’immagine, manipolando abusando e deviando il lavoro dei servitori dello Stato, allo scopo di far prevalere una tesi. Non intendo fare un paragone di livello ma di metodo , quando dico che un lavoro simile è stato fatto in questi tre anni nella vicenda Arkeon.

Quando leggo dell'accusa di plagio o connivenza mossa ai vari sostenitori convinti per quanto critici di Arkeon, non posso non pensare che funziona come quella stessa mossa a Moro di not be him.

When I read that the police had made "Gradoli via a first inspection in 1996, searching all the apartments except the one rented by the Red Brigades, where the tenant did not answer the bell and the staff are gone" , I can not not think that the statements of the Prosecutor of Bari manager who said he could not infiltrate the seminaries of Arkeon staff to gather evidence and conclusive effect of the accusations.

When I read that " Moro has become another, the proof is in his declaration of sanity " I can not think of the PM's arguments that the establishment of an association registered Arkeon is evidence of the association to commit a crime. Or the scorched earth that Tinelli and its affiliates have tried to do about those who try to pass another truth notifying the police of the outside commentators (DiMarzio, Radoani, Martini), trying to silence those who speak in favor of Arkeon (reporting to PM by Tinelli of Fabia, the request for action to silence the blog of Peter and Cosimo) and trying to discredit them in advance from third parties (just intervention No. 22 on the Rise blog that says "Sudorepioggia, Cosimo Peter ... are all members of Arkeon that sponsor only the positive aspects, deliberately overturning the reality ... without even entarre the merits).

But most can not help but think that as the political and moral destruction of Moro (which led to his death) was functional in groundwater with the questions he had put to the DC and the state prison, the same way destruction legal (for now only attempted) and moral Arkeon (which led to his death) is functional to protect a complex of investigations carried out so far one way, never heard the suspects, without verifying the existence of movements Financial that would have to come from this alleged conspiracy and that there are nivece, never check the credibility of witnesses and consultants debated and controversial.

prodest Cui, ognuno lo valuti da sé.

Can Shaving Cause A Genital Herpes Outbreak

The fate and research

Mi ha molto colpito, oggi, leggere il post di S&P sul destino di un uomo e poi quello di Raffaella Di Marzio sulla testimonianza di un uomo dal destino incredibile. In simultanea tra loro. E in sintonia coi pensieri che agitano questi miei ultimi mesi, in cui mi interrogo sul senso della mia vita.

Il senso che so darle? O quello che so accogliere?

Sono convinto che ciò che ho nel cuore ce l’ha messo Dio, per cui in astratto non c’è contraddizione. Ma in concreto? Nel cuore c’è anche tanta roba che non c’ha messo Dio ma a cui probabilmente tengo molto: desideri, ambizioni, paure, idee fisse. Possono entrare in conflitto?

E se poi capita, come capita, che la tua spinta – anche quella che venisse da Dio – ti porta apparentemente in un vicolo cieco? Se i tuoi desideri, i tuoi talenti, ciò che più intimamente senti di essere e di poter dare improvvisamente sembra esserti precluso? Dio fa anche questi scherzi! Certo, col senno di poi è tutto chiaro…ma prima? Ad Abramo chi glielo spiegava perché dovesse sacrificare Isacco?

Non è questione di voler fare la volontà di Dio perché si è bravi ragazzi. Né è questione di cercare di “ridurre il dolore” accettando i rovesci della vita. Chiunque abbia sperimentato anche solo una volta che la vita sa nascondere grandi rinascite dietro grandi sconfitte, al solo patto di saper “mollare la presa”, sa che è più semplicemente questione di essere in pace con se stessi e quindi con gli altri…di andare incontro alla vita per ciò che si è ma lasciandosene anche plasmare.

Mi colpiva molto quando S&P distingueva tra la maggior facilità di accettare le implicazioni del destino di padre e la difficoltà di accettare le implicazioni del destino di uomo. Forse, mi viene da pensare, perché il primo ti porta oltre te stesso e restituisce un senso più grande e più vero alle cose…mentre il primo in qualche modo si compie nella propria solitudine, nella sfida di conoscere se stessi trascendendo se stessi.

Non ho risposte per questo, non per me e quindi per nessuno.

L’unica cosa che so è che nella mia vita, quando ho toccato questi punti di “crisi”, ho sempre sentito di dover cercare dentro di me passando attraverso l’esperienza dell’altro, dell’incontro col diverso.
Questa, per me, era l’esperienza di Arkeon. Che veniva da prima di Arkeon. E che continua dopo.
E’ l’esperienza di essere umano. Di sollevare una domanda…e non deporla.

Maculopapules Treatment

L ' Good art and leave rubbish

(disattendo rapidamente il mio proposito di risentirci a settembre per una comunicazione veloce!)

Anni fa dissi a un dear friend who - while realizing that it must be important - I could not understand what you realize the task of the conductor in classical music, where there were scores. He made me feel two versions of the same piece (the Symphony No. 1 by Brahms, if I remember correctly).
And I knew. The day and night.

I came to think of that episode today when I read an article on Repubblica.it on a brilliant idea of \u200b\u200bthe director of the National Gallery in London in an exhibition exposing the many "fake page" bought in years by the museum. "Learn from the mistakes in the history of a lot more. And we, having thrown away thousands of pounds buying fake paintings, we have learned to make better buying. So I'd like to works created by talented forgers we had more, as the National Gallery is the place where paintings are exhibited sublime but where you study the history of art. "What better way to compare the original and the copy to understand the style, the art?

Then I came to think of the day when, looking at my life, I decided to pull out of my basement my inner false and make a good look around the exhibition in which the removed my life and maybe learn from mistakes. That was ten years ago, I'm still finishing down the cellar stairs! Of course you do not see the masterpieces, indeed it is stuff that would be better off in the cellar ... but is the price of art!

And finally I thought of the many people I have met over the past ten years, which have essentially the same choice. Together we had booked the room through the dining hall: it was called Arkeon. Even there I saw a lot of stuff that they would rather hide in the cellar ... but need to clean up well bring out the garbage.

Music Notes Friendship Bracelet Patterns

A little 'holiday for all of you deserve ...
see you in September! If you want
meanwhile, please leave comments will be moderated and published on my return in September.

The Butler On The Beach Painting

AAA: Centre for Research

developing the content and comments in the last two posts, I can not mention this story. What
- I say this now - for those who know the famous Aesop's fable sull'agnello and the Wolf does not say anything new.

I read on a site on the net a post on the Dr Tinelli Arkeon , which ends with the following statements.

"My proposal today is precisely to make sure that the same FECRIS, as well as being a network of information exchange between member associations that are part of it, could establish itself as a strong point for all associations, that individually they live experiences like ours. Experiences from the perspective of both economic and internal forces, tend to block the activities and weaken, if addressed each in his own small.
The support of large institutions, during the different processes can lead to certain victory, waiting to read more appropriate, and at the same time to demonstrate reasonable force, sectarian organizations themselves, which are all based their actions on awareness of having to 'fight' against voluntary associations. "

For the uninitiated, FECRIS is a European association that brings together various national anti-cult groups. Italy set for today Favis, Aris Aris Veneto and Tuscany, while the corresponding Cesap is today (a figure which I understand means being evaluated for admission).

I do not want to say much about FECRIS, which last year was summoned several times by two people Arkeon (Fabia and Peter Bono ) with requests for help and listening to the modes of behavior Cesap ( evaluated and persecutory questionable) and that it is simply "call out" did not consider even consider a meeting to understand. Even if Arkeon sect was the worst in the world, a meeting to listen to not kill anyone and to avoid the case that really could be something to review operating procedures of a subject that is about to join them. For the series, if they are convinced a priori to know where the truth is and where is wrong, I can certainly make a valuable contribution to the debate about cults!

That said, it is interesting that the proposal Tinelli FECRIS be established as a " strengths for any association . No longer a mere coordination of knowledge and experience, but support for associations involved in fight at seven. Oh yes, because the " sectarian organizations all rely on their own, perhaps knowing that he must fight against voluntary .
assertion a bit 'strange for an institution that came with their colleagues seems to be looking più il conflitto che l'intesa (DiMarzio,Caparesi,Santovecchi,Martini e scusate se è poco). Tuttavia si può convenire che una lotta Cesap contro Scientology sarebbe impari. E infatti il Cesap si guarda bene dall’attaccare Scientology! Dopo uno start up di relativo anonimato fatto di battaglie contro Testimoni di Geova e Neocatecumenali - cioè gruppi religiosi autentici che certamente non ti “daranno in testa” - il salto di notorietà è avvenuto contro Arkeon. Ovvero un gruppo che più scalcagnato non si poteva, privo di qualsiasi reale mezzo o organizzazione, come i fatti hanno dimostrato: in tre anni Arkeon non è riuscito ad avere neanche una rettifica sulla stampa o uno spazio televisivo, se non come imputato to slay. By contrast, working with Cesap FECRIS the Digos and the Court of Bari, is supported by Codacons, goes on television and in newspapers.
is said in these cases, "great with small with big and small."

The most disturbing thing however is the practical purpose Cesap suggests that for this strength: " tiling of large institutions during the different processes can lead to certain victory . Not only is the lady indicates that the target of the alleged Research Center study groups but not "win the processes" (surreal as a person should act as a witness or as an expert witness, not as an accusation!). But even tells us that the processes are not won with facts but with the support, with the ability to pressure, the institutional coverage. Well known to everyone and that people of Arkeon were widely noticed in recent years (as has been said elsewhere, some believe that a program like that of Earth made immediately after the notices of investigation could be prepared in four and four ' eight? And some may have ignored the vast difference in treatment in that place of Arkeon than the other treatment groups, all well placed and VIP customers?).

Dropped Stomach With Pregnancy

covers institutional self-seeking

few days ago I read a book by Vito Mancuso, a Catholic theologian who explained (well known) as Catholicism is considered dall’ebraismo una setta e (cosa a me non nota) come i libri dell’Antico Testamento successivi al Deuteronomio (in sostanza larga parte dei libri sapienziali come il Siracide) non siano da essi riconosciuti, bensì considerati “apocrifi”. Fa strano pensare che per molti ebrei questi libri, che da noi sono considerati appunto “sapienziali”, per il solo fatto di essere definiti apocrifi sono probabilmente sconosciuti e circondati da un alone di mistero e perversione, più o meno come per noi sono oggi i vangeli apocrifi del Mar Morto e in particolare il bellissimo Vangelo di Tommaso! E’ sempre interessante mettersi nei pani degli altri per guardarci!

Ho parlato di questo perché spesso, in our newspapers or broadcasts in some depth, we talk about the trend - in our post-modern - the return of the religious, particularly the religious irrational and even more particularly of a religious cult. The sect has arrived! The most common example is Scientology, but in milder forms, there are also the New Age movement, and even according to some strong spread of charismatic groups within the Catholic Church itself (Neocatechumenal, renewed in spirit, etc.).

It is now clear that in some cases the label of religious movement is a tactical device to circumvent possible charges of crimes of various kinds: in this sense, as I understand, the "religious turn" of Scientology is emblematic. But certainly in many other cases, the spread of new forms of religiosity is a response to a search for meaning that increases with increasing fragmentation of our society and its traditional institutions (family, party, nation).

Personally I have known several people that live some of these experiences: Reiki, Jehovah's Witnesses, Neocatechumenal, renewed in spirit ... I've seen the rites and forms and sometimes left me truly puzzled the exasperation, the strong emotional involvement collective in which it is unclear how individual persons and as actors are imitators aware, mystical forms at or beyond the superstition ... but this is my personal assessments: and in any case I never saw pressures or influences on individuals worse than those that are usually conducted in many Catholic families healthy - with as many other instruments - are putting pressure on their children to address the educational choices, love, work and life. In short, everything in the boundary of free will and individual responsibility.

Yet I can not see that, for groups I mentioned, which are very "quiet", you are wasting at different levels accusations of plagiarism, sectarianism, manipulation, coercion, etc etc ... .. The actions against these groups reported Site Cesap of - for example the headline for some time, "revealed the abuses of the Neocatechumenal" without clarifying that it is an abuse of the liturgical form of sexual violence and not (!) - are just one of many examples and not necessarily the most vile [Please read my comment at the bottom of the post in partial correction ].

Unfortunately these hostilities, which sometimes take the form of real paranoid obsessions, are not the result of a few people or a few groups "Saving Silverman". There is a growing climate of suspicion and intolerance towards new forms of religious or para-religious, as confirmed by many statements to that effect Council of Europe and European Court of Human Rights , who on several occasions reiterated the demand for European governments to proceed with caution laws "anti cult or prevention campaigns against" new religious groups ", seeing in this clear case of violation of principles of freedom of religion and belief enshrined in the Charter of Human Rights.
In this Italy is no different from other countries. Bills to reinstate offenses of plagiarism are constantly recur for years in Parliament and what is worrying is that their proponents in civil society are usually devoid of any anti-cult groups that are distinguished scientific accreditation for fierce criticism of the most diverse groups, from Satanists to be renewed in spirit. But above all it is striking that - in a large reduction of the security forces despite the often-trumpeted security crisis - the state has seen fit to create a special Team Anti Sette (SAS), with a choice as early as the name evokes concern, both in light of the appeal of the European Court not to use the term cult in a timely, both in light of the choices of a subject as the same GRIS (the famous Catholic anti-cult research group) over the years has seen fit to change the name from Research Group Seven Group for Research and Information Socioreligiosa.

In this context, which until not long ago I was totally unknown, it makes clear the development of the case Arkeon, who is there to show how prejudice leads to seven seen everywhere and force the hand in the name of the greater good represented by their defeat. Without rehashing the now infamous history (following the reports of some former members and a small anti-cult association Puglia, investigations have been launched on some of the masters Arkeon method, was suspended the activities of the workshops and now expects a Arkeon Decision of the Court of Bari on the possible opening of a trial of suspects) what strikes me is that, three years after the beginning of this surreal affair, has not yet figured out if some people are under investigation for specific behavior or is the accused as such the method Arkeon.

The logic would lead me to say the first one: you can not - I know - a method acknowledge as such, as this would be tantamount to holding illegal ideas. Sure you can say that conduct is unlawful and, therefore, a method that is unlawful insofar as and until it implements this behavior: if such conduct were not, there would be no problem. With specific regard to allegations made to suspects (abuse of the psychological profession, practicing medicine, then a result of domestic violence and fraud and the Association conspiracy), Arkeon is therefore unlawful only to the extent that:
- promised to cure ills (or limited to those who promise healing from Mali);
- was a psychological method and was carried out by persons not registered in the psychologists;
- commit violence in its context, private (or limited to those who commit violence).
Consequently and conversely this means that the exercise of lawful Arkeon would rather for those who do not make violence that promises healing or that - if it were defined Arkeon psychotherapy - to exercise were registered as psychologists. In
effects of different active teachers only a few have been investigated. One can interpret this as a confirmation that is not in question Arkeon but the way in which some teachers - including also the founder - have exercised? If so, it would mean that tomorrow these other teachers could safely return to their seminars.

Unfortunately, it is clear to everyone that it is not.
simply have not found witnesses against the other masters.
The truth is that, in fact even if not in law, is under indictment Arkeon as psycho!
And the rest is clear that the very use of the term of a psycho is no longer necessary to proceed to a court challenge the offenses alleged, which shows that under discussion are not behaviors but an idea.
I say - for that matter - the comments on the site of the two main witnesses Cesap (Charles and Lela), as well as those of Dr. Tinelli and other foristi, blaming not only individuals but the method as such, dangerous in their re-release of psychotherapy crazy Singer. They say the allegations of Digos in the famous press conference of 2007, as well as indictments of the prosecution against the suspects and DiMarzio.Lo says the fact that in this matter is on the newly formed Anti Team Seven (SAS).

This is disturbing. Why do not you understand
on what basis has estimated that the PM had Arkeon psychotherapy, it is not his responsibility to judge what is and what is not psychotherapy (and in this respect is legitimate to ask who the expert psychologist whose expertise is based on this view and call into question the competence and reliability, especially if it were Tinelli and his infamous studio decennial never seen anyone to date there is no public document of Tinelli that can demonstrate that it - as to the actual skills - is something more than a degree in very interested in the psychology of judicial reporting).
because it violates the most basic principles of the rule of law, establishing a de facto presumption of regardless of guilt. And here there is an injury as big as a house is shown by the fact that the same prosecutors have never named - in what is known - the accused to ask for their account of the facts, as shown by the statements recently given on the website "The case Arkeon "Piero - who says he does not even know what to suspect (and it is not the only one).

Against all this there is a question that I pose for some time.
How is it possible that I can not experience that love making me a seminar Arkeon with whom, and only people like me who loves the experience, without harming anyone? How can the
constant race to the protection of the individual through the creation of new registers and codes can always overwhelm the individual's freedom to live how he wants the same peer? How can two adults can do together voluntarily pay extreme sex without violence or exploitation of prostitution, but I can not pay to participate in a seminar that I like? Why
psychology tells us to do his job?
And who says what is psychology?
O psychologist?
But if I ask the landlord how the wine will say that certainly is delicious. In fact it tells me that "councelor" - which does a job very similar to the psychologist psychologist but is not, and that such seminars could Arkeon - is incompetent, is a creep in disguise, is the antechamber of the scam.
How can we not see that there is an essence of human experience and puts that in the categories of psychology, religion, etc. .. and that is simply self-seeking everyone how the hell they like?

How Much Should A Pack Of Human Weaving Hair Cost

Awareness

Yesterday there was the historic Obama's speech in Cairo.
I was very impressed, even beyond its political and cultural value, because it is a rare example of a speech - regardless of its beauty and potenza retorica - possa essere sostanza. Parlare all'altro, parlargli in casa sua, da uguali, con un linguaggio e con simboli che possono essere condivisi, non è un atto retorico: è un fatto che genera di per sè conoscenza reciproca, che abbatte di per sè barriere e pregiudizi. Invito, chi fosse interessato, a leggerlo nella traduzione italiana che ho linkato sopra.
Cito tutto questo perchè Obama, senza negare se stesso e la sua cultura, compie secondo me un atto fondamentale: mostra coi fatti all'altro di essere disposto ad ascoltarlo, ad imparare da lui. Non a rinunciare ai propri prncipi, ma di essere disposto a confrontarli con quelli altrui, a metterli alla prova del nove, a vederli con gli occhi dell'altro per vedere even if they hold well. It 's a theme that I developed in my last post and reply to a comment Sadali Melik-.

I reflected on all this last night while watching the program on LA7 Otto & 1 / 2 dedicated to the historic event. And I must admit, I really fell in his arms.
A journalist present - can not remember the name - presents an interesting thesis: the view that Obama gives the Islamic world is "the outward projection of his inner history." Obama is the son of a Catholic mother and a Kenyan father. His name is Barak Hussein. It 'grew up in Indonesia, a large Islamic country. In him, in essence, Islam and Christianity, and the West oriente, bianco e nero sono risolti, amalgamati, fusi con successo… Obama vede una possibile armonia tra l’Islam e Occidente che in effetti è l’armonia della sua vicenda umana personale. In realtà – conclude la giornalista - c’è uno scarto tra l’Islam interiore di Obama e l’Islam reale. Obama vede se stesso, non la realtà, nella quale non c’è alcuna armonia né (sembra di capire) possibilità di armonia.

Ascolto questa tesi e penso: sicuramente in Obama il conflitto è risolto mentre nel mondo no, ma è anche vero che nel mondo il conflitto è agitato da molti ma non da tutti e che è tutt’altro che inevitabile. Detto altrimenti e usando the words of the journalist, perhaps the inevitable conflict that you see between the West and Islam is the outward projection of his inner conflict. His need of the conflict, to maintain and strengthen the idea of \u200b\u200bidentity.

The operator of the schemes and identity is so strong that after a while the same reporter and another journalist from the left end in the studio as oppose to a carrier of the instances of Israelis and Palestinians respectively. Just when commenting WOULD BE's speech synthesis and reconciliation of a U.S. President! The attraction force of opposition is so strong that when the challengers are making peace, they start to fight gli arbitri!

Una nota buon senso arriva, inaspettata, dall’intervento di una terza giornalista, di AlJazeera. Algerina “occidentale”, che dirige uno dei più importanti network, che dirige molti uomini ma ha da qualche anno messo il fazzoletto al capo. E che alla domanda “la condizione delle donne nei paesi islamici è estremamente dura e secondo molti in occidente la colpa è dell’Islam” risponde “spesso è vero, anche se non sempre…ma lo è anche la condizione di molti uomini”.
Sembra dire: nella giustizia, come nell’ingiustizia, siamo insieme.
Sembra guardare alla sterile contesa tra uomini e donne in occidente, una guerra tra poveri, and say the pain does not try to go out climbing over one another.

Warm Up Music Basketball

My new teacher

Latest post by Peter or Sudorepioggia give me the inspiration for the post this evening.

Commenting on the last post of S & P said that exactly like that of Ambrosoli figures, which are free, which does not belong to any "family" and fighting to continue its service, not just loved by the majority as rather it is precisely because of discomfort, embarrassment. The adjective with which they are usually nailed to public ridicule is " moralists," as if it was a perversion to rage do one's duty and what feels right. This is enough to make us forget that this man did not ask anyone anything, and has only given her for more. It is enough to make everyone forget about asking the simple question "but where was I when he did this?". Definitely annoying, these men.
repeating the quotation from the Reverend King reported by Peter I'm not afraid of the violent words, but the silence of the honest. Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter .

do not know the personal story of Ambrosoli, but for me I have often wondered in recent months, it has opened this blog e più in generale perché in questi anni non mi sia “sfilato” dalla vicenda Arkeon, ma abbia fatto – o abbia cercato di fare come sapevo – la mia parte. Non è stato per gratitudine rispetto a quell’esperienza e a quelle persone, anche se la gratitudine e l’affetto sono molto grandi, non misurabili. Né è stato perché, come alcuni vogliono suggerire, io sia un fanatico sostenitore di Arkeon o un nostalgico che non riesce a rassegnarsi alla fine di un’epoca o un pupazzo manovrato da terzi: posso anzi dire di sentirmi molto libero da quell’esperienza, che certo volentieri ripeterei per alcuni suoi tratti unici, ma da cui allo stesso tempo nell’ultimo anno di attività I was taking inside the distance in search of a reflection of my personal space (in fact I believe that this trait shared by many other people like me and older than me have tried to make the voice of Arkeon in these three years and I do not think a case ). And this should make it clear that it is also not even looking for or hoping to restart a seminar for me, with all the pain that leads me to say so, it is certain that this experience is over. Do not over, because nothing ends as in physics, but only turns ... but it certainly ended in that form.
So the question: why do it?

Certainly there is a part of " liability." Having known that path, those people and seeing the good he has done to many, I can not remain silent in front of a distortion of reality so violent, vulgar and paranoid as that carried out in recent years by a few people and amplified by the media. This does not prevent me from seeing the limits of that path and that experience, indeed, if anything, allows me to see them even better. And of course there is the desire to "protect the future " to do my small part because it can not happen to others what happened, is happening and perhaps happen to us, I would not want anyone - being tomorrow in the lurch where we are today - he could look e provare lo stesso senso di tristezza che provo io guardando alcuni piccoli esponenti del mondo antisette, che da anni conoscevano le modalità della d.ssa Tinelli, non sono intervenute e oggi cercano di “tenere il profilo basso” per cautela. Sin qui è vero, potrei essere chiamato un “moralista”.

Ma non è solo quello. Il motivo vero, personalmente, è che incontrai Arkeon lungo il percorso della mia ricerca di me stesso, della lotta che conduco con me per conoscermi, sopraffarmi e arrendermi alla mia natura più autentica. E oggi non posso, proprio non posso, far finta di non essermi incontrato, di non aver conosciuto la mia storia, di non aver toccato la forza e la chiarezza delle mie aspirazioni and my identity. And then I can retire in good order, I can not say "it was great, thanks," I can not tell which one I attended was a dangerous path, that the depths of my soul and touch others were misleading, that the great was born there or has been consolidated (love, children, friends) are not protected and nourished by that space.
I can not do stupid not to go to war.

agree indeed, according to the rule that I have known and accepted in the work of Arkeon as a rule the soul and life, that what happened is the natural continuation of work on me and on my life. My teacher is no longer but Vito The Vito Tinelli ... and as rightly said, the best teachers are always the assholes (in the archetypal sense, I mean). There are "intensive and chairs" that apply in the morning saying that I left my wife to stay calm when the police came without knowing why, or the day I arrived in office after a transmission of the Strip and a call made me afraid of the CEO have lost their jobs without knowing why, or night I called to tell me that one of his friends had lost their jobs, that one had attempted suicide, one that had failed to keep the family together and all this c ' was a reason.

And then, thinking Ambrosoli to Falcone, Marco Biagi, a Calabrian, or the many other civilian heroes of our country, I am convinced that their choice was not dictated by "morality." I think it was simply the only way that they honor themselves, their history and their future. As for

Arkeon and what Peter called "the silence of the honest " I agree that perpetrated on us is a form of abuse perpetrated on the media plan and the judiciary, which is undermining the sense of 'authority and truth. But I also believe that the real abuse, the most dramatic, is the one perpetrated on the level of individual lives, and undermined the authority and truth are the ones within, as show examples of some posthumous revisionism about their lives, so years of existence, wives, children, work and friends become in just two years of top-down media campaign: this is a drastic change in those normally given to mental manipulation sectarian. But - to be clear - I also believe that before these three abuses, and especially the third, there is a liability to suffer it. What Peter finely calls " the act that is not the answer that I could not give, earlier in my life, the face of injustice" and that S & P calls in a more explicit "the silence of Paraculo .

Where To Buy Matula Tea Store

The case Arkeon - new site

Among the comments last post I have received reports of a new website, entitled "ilcasoarkeon" referred here willingly carried over the link and I add in my blogroll.

http://ilcasoarkeon.wordpress.com/

Cake Dirt Bike Tracks

The Discreet Charm of the plumber

This morning my wife showed me a promotional blurb on the magazine of the supermarket, where he was promoting a service of "husbands for rent." Quote the ad said: " a service that offers help to all the families and wives who can not count on her husband for committees and house chores. You have to renew the letters of the car? Mow the garden? Accompany children to the game? Do not worry if your partner is overwhelmed by work or prefer to play soccer with friends: her husband rent solve all your problems ... a good opportunity for the wives and even husbands! "

not discuss the merits of the service, which is certainly a worthy legittimissima and commercial initiative, but the value of "symbolic", the "unspoken" which seems to me to express.

The short article is aimed at women in fact tired of the fact that " can not count on your husband for house chores " why " prefer to play soccer with friends ! The items are stones and do not think of adding me if I say that seems to feel (though not written) that "even" for odd jobs. And the proof is that the proposed solution is " rent a husband." Not a "pet rent", a "factotum", but "a husband."
According to the blurb, in essence, these women are not only tired of having to do everything themselves, but are tired of not having a husband by side, one that devolved to this company's services is not only the provision of additional time and skills to the need for home, but also and perhaps especially the compensation of a void, a loneliness. It is not the time of her husband's missing is the his presence, his support, his reliability. He played football!

Sure there are men of this kind. I remember that even in the seminaries of Arkeon you mentioned the football team as a tool type used by some men to escape the intimacy and the responsibility of the couple relationship and at the same time to defend themselves from intimacy with the men through a relationship that most adult goliardic . Two birds with one stone. But in
seminars Arkeon the finger was put on the wound to show and why people would take responsibility to heal, to make a leap forward in intimacy, starting from the shared sense of absence and distance to reach everyone to choose to "return to self": that man not only his wife was missing, but also to himself. And the same was true in other cases from the inverse for his wife.
But here the wife has resigned and choose - bea (or) treatment happy - to solve all the rent with her husband. And the opportunity, the paragraph makes clear, it is also good for their husbands, so they can continue to play soccer or be overwhelmed by work. Basically you pay to go on living happy and (s) happy.
It makes me think hard about that article a couple of years ago that appeared in the Republic, according to which the statistics of a classic American university showed that couples who live far last longer!

I Have A Fascination With My Bfs Testicles

Style is everything in life

Today the site of Cesap I found the following ad, titled "Intimidation .

"In recent months some people have already reported to the court, by means of warnings, blogs, letters trying to intimidate and impede the activities of Dr. Tinelli and CESAP. These modes of action have been reported to authorities immediately authorities. As soon as possible publish the names of those who organized this campaign of intimidation and vilification.
The Office "

I must say that I truly understand who it refers: the talk Tinelli many blogs, critics on his work but very different from each other, some throwing insults and defamation (as it does on ADUC) and other leading information and reasoned argument. Which of these would be the intimidating and interfering is not given to understand.
At this point, fortunately, I reassured the press: the names will be published "as soon as possible." But at this point I do not understand what the purpose of such a statement. If the names of these people, "which is already reported to the judicial authorities," will be made "as soon as possible," what the press is talking to me? Why not wait to say what can not say when he can say? It seems a little 'convoluted to me!
Hard to escape the doubt that the title of the press does not refer to its content but its purpose!
And last, but this is just one fixed my formal, it is surprising that a press of this relief has been given to the signing of the Secretariat and the Steering Committee or the Presidency. It 's true that in many organizations, especially smaller ones who live the commitment and dedication of a few people, the same person often plays multiple roles ... but if you give them UNPO, roles, you might as well stick to them, no ?

Pogo Single Deck Pinochle

The blame is always out of me I carry the fire

"There he is!" I said. Berlusconi to what the wife says "To have plagiarized." The words were not those, but the meaning was exactly that.

And he says almost unaware (or unconcerned) that the idea of \u200b\u200ba wife who, after thirty years of marriage and four children, asks for divorce for the suggestion of the opposition is perhaps a little 'grotesque. Unaware (or unconcerned) that, describing his wife as a woman who after thirty years of marriage and four children to be dictated by others ideas on her husband, in fact, describes a woman of little value, a silly little woman, unaware of himself. But mostly unaware (or unconcerned) that those words returned - much of what his wife - the reality of an infinite distance between the two: perhaps not a bitter outburst of jealousy, however, a possible sign of residual heat or pride, but a cold stored to a woman who sees and knows now by having so little to suggest to others the nature of her husband.
I read the words of Berlusconi and to think about the families on TV have reported the plagiarism of their children in Arkeon. No different from families who say "it's all because of that there" is guilty of bad companies "etc etc ... Families who do not want to contemplate the possibility of a choice by their children's different from what they would do. Families who pretend not to know that if these children were so influenced by the first comer, they could have in twenty years influenzare ben di più. Ma soprattutto famiglie pronte a sacrificare la dignità dei propri figli sull’altare delle proprie convinzioni, trasformandoli dai figli modello a delle persone deboli e plagiabili non appena questi prendano strade a loro inconcepibili. Un fatto che – come nel caso di Berlusconi – denuncia una distanza tra le persone maggiore di quella che esse vorrebbero vedere e fa capire da dove possano nascere improvvisamente le incomprensioni o i conflitti tra persone prima vicine.

How Many Days Off For Pneumonia

La conclusione del mio ultimo post mi ha fatto ripensare a un libro che ho letto recentemente “La strada” di Cormac McCarthy. E’ la storia apparentemente disperata di un padre e un figlio sopravvissuti a un nuclear holocaust, wandering in search of survival. And the father - which, unlike the child has experienced the world "first" - he always says to his son " we bring the fire." With this - I understand - means a condition that becomes almost a responsibility that we are, we need to do this, despite the circumstances.

The story, again, is desperate than the common sense of what can be hope. Yet it is not hopeless. The finish shows a possibility that is not a happy ending, which is not a hope, but that makes sense. A possible way of things. That sense that - but here it is I who speak, do not McCarthy - it's like the rug from below is pure chaos, seen from above shows a drawing, you must go and see it through, without claiming to understand it before. They call it faith.

Recently I read another book by McCarthy, "Sunset Limited". Unlike "La Strada", a book is at times hilarious, grotesque, theatrical. Yet it shares the same pattern: white / black. life / death, compared to the extremes without any setting, without narration, the reduction of life to its extremes. What I find great in this author, although of a magnitude difficult to match, has the deepest respect for reality and for the man, in all its possible and contradictory expressions. In his book eschews any temptation to respond. To indicate a way out, or her choice. Tile two alterative and shows the grim immediacy of the truth. On the one hand, the lack of meaning. The other the possibility of an effect, never said, never read, but felt, intuited, something I can not explain if you do not like my experience of the Eucharist, which I take every Sunday for years without being able to understand the meaning, while without being able to live out the depth, but I feel I can not give it up without losing something.

other words, offers no answers - that videntemene did not - but his questions. This, to me, è un maestro. E un uomo.

Allora a chi piace consiglio:
- Cormac McCarthy, 2006, “Sunset limited”, Einaudi, 10 € (si legge in un’oretta)
- Cormac McCarthy, 2006, “La strada”, Einaudi, 17 €

Ikusa Otome Valkyrie Online Free

responsibility of the caretaker

Questo week end abbiamo partecipato al matrimonio di una parente. Nell’insieme classico e – triste dirlo – piuttosto noioso, mi ha colpito il prete: uno spagnolo sui sessant’anni, magro, sanguigno, che ha detto poche cose, come pietre.
Ha riassunto in pochi semplici concetti il senso di essere sposi, le cose che fondano and keep a marriage alive over the years: the friendship between the spouses, one thing that I discover every day with my wife when I confess that she is certainly my best friend, transparency, as a practice of sharing and regeneration of the daily trust and mutual aid, and humility, to accept what life brings without expecting to dominate.
things said simply and firmly, watching the couple with deep eyes, like a father who gave the final recommendations to the children on the doorstep. I saw him intent, with a bat, to plant the stakes surrounding this young couple to give them a solid foundation, to defend it: from the edge of life, from its weaknesses, by illusions. I've heard - I have to say "for once" - a priest who has taken the responsibility to guard the truth and people, saying things too uncomfortable. Like when he said "and I commend the families they stay out. I have seen marriages fail for the mothers-in-law and that problems between the spouses. "
Oooh, you said it! Finally, a priest who says what is written in the Gospel (for this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother) without indulgences, bluntly, pointing to the side clearly uncomfortable to say but it is there and if not that acts. He has taken his responsibility and he - now that's been said - if you take even their parents. And to give the meters, said his latest meeting with the octogenarian mother, who in the doorway as he greeted her, apparently for the last time, seeing him cry he said: "The children that I have of God, not me: go! "
But the thing that I liked and I hit was the last. "When you have problems - he said - do not go by their parents or friends or psychologist or by others. Go there, in front of the cross, together. " Together, in the face of Christ crucified. There you will find the answers you need. Not by others, not by specialists, not advisers. You too, especially you, take your responsibility, when shaken, not going to look for ways out, "break into" together, and through the storm with your loyalty in the heart. To your spouse (your husband) to God as
Each of us is the guardian.
guess some specialist advice would have to say about this priest: If you have a problem go to a psychologist, not before the cross! But I think the feeling was a little 'less literal and a bit' deeper. Go where you want, but do not forget to go in front of yourself. Do not forget to do it with your wife. And do not try to circumvent the test, because that is yours, there's nothing to do. Have faith in yourself and in life, not addressed as a disease to be cured but with the courage to live it. You are the guardian of life that has been given you, you're the only one who can bring it to complete, to discover the mystery, revealing the unexpected implication behind the apparent defeat. You're the only one who can rise from your death!
I recall the final scene of "The Last Samurai" in which the samurai, who is dying in his battle seemingly absurd, to answer the question he was placed "as are the cherry blossoms," he says smiling, "are all perfect. "

Body Opponent Bag Used

Transformation

continue to develop a discourse that goes unintentionally unraveling post after post, as a reflection that part out loud to me but not just about me and I want to share with you.

periodically about the path of my life and the question I often ask myself is "what I've tried ? what I found? . Sometimes the answer changes over time.
When I began my journey was not happy: I needed a companion, I felt distant from the people, especially I felt alone inside. The professional and intellectual excitement kept me "on", but basically they did not cover either alone or more deeply the feeling of being inadequate. Often lived as to be incapable of ... ". In fact today I would say that was the feeling of being immature, being afraid to grow. Common things to many people I have met over the years and, like them, for many years I had not seen or had not wanted to see because they generate suffering: a friend told the Saturday night he came home and said, "yet another day passed in vain "... and I felt to know that.
The decision to start a job on me was the choice to face this shadow. A choice that was born from having exceeded a threshold of pain, from feeling that the truth could not do more harm than they already felt. The hope was of course change, "healing". So it was for me and I think for many of my fellow travelers.
This change him as a "tolerance": a kind of surgery that removes the cancer and back to a health condition. Overcoming loneliness, overcome fear, overcome the sense of inferiority, etc etc ... During the seminars Arkeon watched other people who seemed to me "later" to me and I wanted to be like them, I wanted to find that strength, that freedom, that 'I felt that it had opened. I found myself working on the things that kept me still, I loose the knot that bound me and inner freedom won would become physical, mental and social strength, security, love, success. I said it to me in words that felt less "vulgar" (see my physical shape, fullness in the reports, an expression of my creativity) but in fact they were. The Superman.

Looking back I realize that this excess was more simply a "flight to" escape from loneliness, escape from fear. Escape from myself. A downward spiral, but still an escape. That "superman" was not me, was the negation of me. It was the way to erase what I did not love me, get rid of the "bad brother" I had inside. Looking back on those days was evident as I used those tools work to feel stronger, higher. In fact, instead of trying to know me, I apply to judge others.

I think this misunderstanding is very common in the seminaries, as well as I think it is very common in general. The will to change is to know yourself but not get rid of the problems, that is, change others, acquire a power over them (real or alleged to be). No crossing is in pain, self-acceptance, openness to life, but the denial of pain, denial of self, barricaded against life. When the chickens come home to roost later and that way of personal growth takes me to fall down, when this way of expression to me puts me in front of my failure, it becomes hard to sketch. If I've learned to accept myself, others and life as they are, if I agreed to take the place waiting for me and not what I want, then climbs a wild rage, a sense of frustration and betrayal. Not being able to recognize that I am what I am and not something else, I have to "download package" to someone else, guilty of deluded and led me on the street who showed me exactly what I wanted to cancel.
This has nothing to do with the fact that someone actually deluded. Returning to the example of Judas , he was looking for a worldly king found in and receiving Jesus was pretty clear that Jesus was not, all his acts as well as his words are proof. But he tried a worldly king able to leave Israel by the Romans and Jesus was the perfect candidate, so he could not say no. So when Jesus reaffirms the king of another kingdom, Judah can not follow him, nor can just leave to find another king, but must punish and humiliate him because Judah had given him their dreams and he does not embody them saputi. The theory of plagiarism is an easy way to say that is not me who wanted to rub his life using the tarot cards, but you're the one who cheated me.

Over the years I have seen many people do not deny the path Arkeon, but on its way. Accusing them of their masters cheated or at least deluded. Derision and hate them because they were not this or quell’altra cosa. Dall’avvio della campagna mediatica contro Arkeon, ovviamente, questo numero è aumentato esponenzialmente. Non nego, non l’ho mai fatto, che a volte nei seminari ci fosse una “spinta al superamento”, una ricerca del riscontro del lavoro nei risultati eccessiva; ne fa parte – nel mio giudizio - quella ricerca del “testimonial” e del “garante” che in molti hanno rimproverato a Vito. Ma è anche vero – e questo è stato per me il dono più prezioso di Arkeon – che negli anni ho visto il lavoro dei seminari cambiare con le persone, ho visto scemare questa spinta egoica e crescere invece una ricerca di umiltà e servizio che avevo nel cuore e che ha close to this path. I saw people "who had the balls" does not accept the push and oppose his humility, even in pain.
I say rather that each person is responsible for their own choices and if someone got carried away by the "self-overcoming" believe they have found the road to success, but many have always kept their feet firmly on the ground. And I also say that those who spoke of exaltation and the pursuit of profit were excited that they hoped to have found the way of profit and that the sacred fire of Savonarola which now devours them stems from a bitter disappointment of their desires, like Judas .

personally in recent years compared to my personal life I had to deal with rapid ascents and fast descents, with bitter disappointment of my deepest dreams and my ambitions as well as the human. Today, I bring some painful wounds in the flesh, wondering why God has given me some talent and then frustrate in manire so obvious. Faced with the growth of other, there was a time when I wondered if my work in the seminars were not just failed to do: I can say that today was not the case, the workshops I have led nowhere but I have simply left there, helping me to be who I was, more truly. And if I look in the mirror, I see a man whom I can trust.

How Do I Stop Desmume From Lagging

The cross

The interesting debate Blog Fioridarancio suggests to me a reflection that was growing against the backdrop of Easter, so many events going on in my life and the people I love. Li Punti many reflections in my previous posts. To avoid repeating what has been said by others, I invite those who wish to read this post first briefly review the comments to the post of Fioridarancio (then pay me royalties, ok?).

In all the views I shared many things. I believe that among the "clear line" which according S & P and Cosimo distinguished by Judas and Peter the second such humanity that unites them there Pulvis is the cross .
Peter says he is willing to follow Jesus, but still does not know what it means to carry the cross, and when this is coming, he hesitates, escapes, but eventually resolves hugged: first metaphorically and actually. Judah but did not provide any cross of Christ in his idea and when it arrives it is rejected that Jesus, coming to denounce him for betraying the hopes placed in him (without him ever confirm, indeed).
I also believe - but here I go beyond my limits of course - that the difference between Peter and Judas in the face of the cross when you reconfirm your face bankruptcy: Peter weeps bitter tears of mortification, dalle quali nascerà l’abbraccio della propria croce; Giuda si suicida, rifiutandosi di farsi testimone della croce e quindi sfuggendola una seconda volta. Come non accettava il “fallimento” di Gesù, così non può accettare il proprio fallimento.

Come è già stato detto da altri, tante persone come Pietro si sono sfilate o mantenute a distanza di fronte alla vicenda di Arkéon. Alcuni invece hanno scelto la posizione di Giuda, denunciando il falso per avere la punizione di Vito. Perché?

Si badi bene che ciò non riguarda solo Arkéon, anzi. Accade anche in molti altri casi che si possono leggere in rete, guardando ad esempio le storie riportate sul sito Falsi abusi . Anche in questi casi, come nel nostro, si incontrano dei Giuda. Ma soprattutto si incontrano “professionisti” (psicologi, pubblici ministeri, assistenti sociali, poliziotti, …) che intervengono nelle relazioni familiari con modalità devastanti ed agghiaccianti, senza cercare la composizione e il superamento delle ferite, bensì il loro risarcimento; invocano, reclamano, pretendono la punizione esemplare, ponendosi al fianco delle vittime come paladini e non accompagnandole “a casa” (quale che sia di volta in volta casa); e a questo fine fomentano, rinfocolano la rabbia, il dolore, perché i colpevoli siano puniti, tacciando di viltà quelli che non denunciano, arrivando talvolta addirittura a forzare le persone perché “dicano ciò che sanno” finendo in effetti per far dire loro ciò che non volevano (si legga in proposito la vicenda del caso Brescia ). Il dolore non va trasformato: va risarcito!

La domanda è perché?

In un suo bel post S&P dice “ quanto spazio resta al professionismo delle relazioni familiari se padri e figli si parlano e si incontrano, se lo stesso accade a madri e figlie, ai mariti e alle mogli?”. Ancora una volta non so cosa volesse dire S&P, parlo quindi di come io intendo le sue parole.
Certo ci sono interessi in tutto questo: perché alcune professional castes want a monopoly on pain and defend it from anything that can take it from their eyes, and because the pain of people you can ride by selling their lucky charms and amulets, tarot as well as court cases. This and weighs a lot. But I can not shake the feeling that the amount of anger, cruelty, determination and ferocity that some of these people put in their elbowing for a place in the sun is excessive in relation to a simple profit target. There's more, the staff.
Why is it a scandal if mothers and daughters come together after injury, if fathers and sons speak after fight, if husbands and wives to meet after having "killed"? Because the pain can not be crossed and transformed? What happens if people go through their wounds include those of the other, whether victim and perpetrator are able to meet as people maneuvered against each other by a pain that was born elsewhere?
A devastating grief. From which to be reborn. Childbirth.
Personally, I bow before this and listening. But I can imagine that this is unacceptable to some. Probably those that step has not accomplished.

Imagine A on top of a cliff, unable to get off, only with B.
And imagine that at some point to say
A: "I'll try, maybe I will die but I want to try! What are you doing? "
B:" No, you're crazy, I do not come! "
A:" Are you sure? come on! "
B:" No, I'm coming! "
A:" So I go. Forgive me. Farewell! "
B:" NO DO NOT GO "
A:" I chose. Goodbye "
B hesitates, crying, screaming ... then pushes him off the cliff.

If I can not overcome my prison, I can not even afford to get out leaving me alone.

Laser Fx Bowling Manual Instructions

Onegai shimas

The feeling - my own - is that these days is developing in the "circle of blogs, an interesting tour of shares, about many things but reminds me of the figure of the teacher.

Master is not - in my opinion - someone who teaches. And 'someone through whom we learn. Master
not me to tell me (it would be a good assumption), but it's something that you find in me. In a
my post, I talked about the master of pain. Fioridarancio made reference to sin. Sudorepioggia error. Tribal Fire to his new job, to its customers.

But the pain can be sterile, sin can wreak havoc, the error can be fatal, the customer can be "dumb". What makes the "masters" these accidents?
I would say my ability to listen.
My choice of listening. That click that makes you say, inside you, talk to your god, "what that mistake, what I can not see where I can change?" Instead of shouting "why is this happening? Why me? Because others are bad? ".
I call this " expectations."

Foster was a word we used very Arkeon to describe the relationship with the teacher. Some people have understood (or declined) as a trust. Someone like addiction. Personally I always thought that the award was not against the master, but of life: faith, not necessarily religious, that events have meaning and that we can choose not to try to change the events but to let them take me to see where, what they are telling me. A concept of equilibrium with the existence, if you will, where counter-thrust events and actions can not be a dance and a fight.

In all this, the teacher is often just a tool, I choose the lever to lift the lid of my strength or my blindness. I do not seek the master, try me. I do not care how he is the master, I am interested as I am done. My research does not depend on him, my understanding is not dependent on him. And if you can master il dolore, il peccato, l’errore, allora certamente può esserlo anche un uomo, un qualunque uomo, il meno dotato, il meno giusto, come il più santo e grande.

Tante cose vorrei dire su questo argomento…ma spero che qualcuno voglia aggiungere i propri pensieri, le proprie esperienze.
Per ora, ringrazio i miei maestri.

What Episode Did Vegeta And Bulma Meet?

The meaning of things

Voglio riprendere qui e sviluppare un discorso cui ho già accennato con alcuni miei commenti sia sul blog di Sudore&pioggia sia su quello di Risè . Il discorso sul "senso delle cose”. Nasce da domande che mi pongono la mia vita, da esperienze che ho attraversato o sto attraversando, e che vorrei condividere with others.

When years ago I began my journey of research staff had no clear ideas about what I was after: he was restless. The only certainty - and I was well aware - was the force with which childhood chasing me the parable of the talents: the awareness that I had been given talents and that one day I was asked to account for how they had used. At that time, obviously, this was not related to the sense of passing time and opportunity that goes away, but only and simply to my sense of personal responsibility: God has given me the talent, but use them just depends on me.

This question obviously came with the arrival of twenty years and questions about my future now beginning to feel the possibility of an impact on my life choices and see that a little later I met some potentially definitive crossroads. The questions that arose they took many different roads to take me years after that experience was crucial for me Arkeon.

In those years I began my " struggle with life," made of dreams and plans, some implemented, some ongoing, others frustrated, sometimes quite painful. And in this fight I discovered that the true results are not achieved or missed targets (trivial as money or important as a smile or a family) but the ability to " make sense "of things. Better: of " accept" the sense of things. It is said that the way I wanted. It is said that is how I imagined it. But I can accept that things can have a meaning that goes beyond me because it comes from before me. That transcends me. For me this has to do with faith, but I think that may exist in a secular vision "faith in life", the 'openness to life. " A passage from the Bible very dear to me says " through the valley of tears in the change source " (Psalm 84: 7-8): that's what I mean. E 'pain that acceptance as part of life, cercarne l’insegnamento, di cui parlavo nel mio post sul guerriero e la vittima .

In quest’ottica la vita perde i connotati della lotta col destino, del lavoro di Sisifo, della corsa contro il tempo, per diventare l’opera della mia vita, tanto grande quanto minuscola. La certezza che Dio ha chiesto proprio a me di portare questa piccola goccia nel mare. In alcuni momenti ciò mi fa sentire che il dolore è una carezza ruvida di Dio, che in silenzio mi osserva e mi sostiene mentre muovo i miei piccoli passi di uomo. E scopro che, un po’ alla volta, nel tracciare quotidianamente il bilancio della mia vita la domanda è sempre meno “sono soddisfatto?” e sempre più “chi are you? Who am I ".

In this sense, in this way, Arkeon was decisive for me. Yes, he gave me some tools, some knowledge of the mechanisms for the soul, the heart of the automatisms, collective unwritten laws that govern human lives. But mainly because he offered me a circle where to sit, meet others and myself. Where to look into the lives of others all that I could not see my life. Where you can hear the cry of my soul, I thought I had pain and instead of life. Where other men could accept the teachings that I had not fully welcomed by my father, to learn from him and return to start my life as a man. Where to share a piece of road.

Arkeon I brought in a heart of stone and has given me a heart of flesh.

Damask Blackberry Curve

Reflections on the world anticult

Here I take a cue from Peter Bono launched his second blog Step by step .

In recent months, starting from the events that affected Arkeon, has developed an intense debate in and about the world anticult Italian. For those who want to "rewind" and dedicate an hour of time, much information can be found in the few interventions on Blog Peter Bono, on that of Dr DiMarzio, Blog Covilt and under "Why did he fall arrivals Scierntology "Newsgroup Firs.

All these testimonies are a bleak picture, characterized mainly by a strong and aggressive litigation, lack of effective thickness of academic and professional environment silence.

A quick glance at the blog mentioned a few highlights like the protagonists of the anticult Italian have often shared a piece of their initial training course or service, as in the case of Radoani, Caparesi Santovecchi and who collaborated with Tinelli and Cesap The Tinelli, which in turn has worked to his time with the Gris, etc etc. In an environment lacking in resources and personnel, this should encourage the growth aggregation in order to put together the forces, resources and experiences. Conversely sector players to continue to operate in minimal structures, little more than one-person, spending so much energy into long and sometimes violent disputes anticult internal environment, as in the case in the clashes that opposed the network and sometimes the courts the Tinelli and several of his former assistants.

At first glance, the tone and manner of these clashes would declassified all the "personal squabbles." But it would be a mistake, as clearly demonstrated in violent ostracism that struck at different times of people who tried to challenge from within the environment itself on matters of method, of ability, approach to problems: examples are the cases of DiMarzio and Martini. These people were ignored and criticized from the anticult for putting into question not so much the concept of plagiarism, brainwashing or sectarianism, but their application simplistic and a priori in the absence of direct knowledge of persons and groups subject to such allegations. Even having made contact with supporters of different positions as the CESNUR in Italy in search of tools and comparisons made by both researchers subject to charges of "apostasy" from the environment of origin.

This suggests that the anticult conflict environment is not a problem of "internal quarrels" and "dirty linen to wash in the family", as some have heard it said on Firs, but is a structural problem with the inability to compare different positions from their own. Inability guarded by the absence of a code of conduct, a trade association, a training school or in short, anything that ensures a possibility of confrontation, transparency and evolution.

The question I ask myself and then there is this: an environment that does not know the internal comparison on different positions on the plagiarism, the brainwashing, the concept of sect, who can not discuss whether and how to talk not only with the cult victims but also with members of the seven; dealing with mockery and contempt deepening scientific and cultural matters; judicially and publicly attacking those who try to "talk with the enemy" ... such an environment that gives assurances of fairness and clarity in dealing with cases that are submitted? that provides guarantees of working for the truth and not to search for the guilty at all costs, that gives guarantees to promote the inner peace of the victims and their instrumental exasperation? If we consider that these subjects are the only partners of the police and court records and to manage complaints we can well understand the risks hidden behind everything.

By opening my blog I wrote that I can not know the other if I do not know myself first. And I wrote that will inevitably attempt to explore all of oneself along routes other than those already beaten encounters resistance from the environment of origin, which in our search sees in the mirror put all their fears and disclaimers. This seems all the more true in this world anticult, which more than others is still a world of individuals because of the inability to surpass themselves in a collective dimension, which seems to project their own anxieties about the world, their manipulative ways and sectarian , its inability to act in the light of the sun.

This was a painful but valuable learning curve for those who wanted to accept. I only hope that among them there should also be someone in this world anticult.