My new teacher
Latest post by Peter or Sudorepioggia give me the inspiration for the post this evening.
Commenting on the last post of S & P said that exactly like that of Ambrosoli figures, which are free, which does not belong to any "family" and fighting to continue its service, not just loved by the majority as rather it is precisely because of discomfort, embarrassment. The adjective with which they are usually nailed to public ridicule is " moralists," as if it was a perversion to rage do one's duty and what feels right. This is enough to make us forget that this man did not ask anyone anything, and has only given her for more. It is enough to make everyone forget about asking the simple question "but where was I when he did this?". Definitely annoying, these men.
repeating the quotation from the Reverend King reported by Peter I'm not afraid of the violent words, but the silence of the honest. Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter .
do not know the personal story of Ambrosoli, but for me I have often wondered in recent months, it has opened this blog e più in generale perché in questi anni non mi sia “sfilato” dalla vicenda Arkeon, ma abbia fatto – o abbia cercato di fare come sapevo – la mia parte. Non è stato per gratitudine rispetto a quell’esperienza e a quelle persone, anche se la gratitudine e l’affetto sono molto grandi, non misurabili. Né è stato perché, come alcuni vogliono suggerire, io sia un fanatico sostenitore di Arkeon o un nostalgico che non riesce a rassegnarsi alla fine di un’epoca o un pupazzo manovrato da terzi: posso anzi dire di sentirmi molto libero da quell’esperienza, che certo volentieri ripeterei per alcuni suoi tratti unici, ma da cui allo stesso tempo nell’ultimo anno di attività I was taking inside the distance in search of a reflection of my personal space (in fact I believe that this trait shared by many other people like me and older than me have tried to make the voice of Arkeon in these three years and I do not think a case ). And this should make it clear that it is also not even looking for or hoping to restart a seminar for me, with all the pain that leads me to say so, it is certain that this experience is over. Do not over, because nothing ends as in physics, but only turns ... but it certainly ended in that form.
So the question: why do it?
Certainly there is a part of " liability." Having known that path, those people and seeing the good he has done to many, I can not remain silent in front of a distortion of reality so violent, vulgar and paranoid as that carried out in recent years by a few people and amplified by the media. This does not prevent me from seeing the limits of that path and that experience, indeed, if anything, allows me to see them even better. And of course there is the desire to "protect the future " to do my small part because it can not happen to others what happened, is happening and perhaps happen to us, I would not want anyone - being tomorrow in the lurch where we are today - he could look e provare lo stesso senso di tristezza che provo io guardando alcuni piccoli esponenti del mondo antisette, che da anni conoscevano le modalità della d.ssa Tinelli, non sono intervenute e oggi cercano di “tenere il profilo basso” per cautela. Sin qui è vero, potrei essere chiamato un “moralista”.
Ma non è solo quello. Il motivo vero, personalmente, è che incontrai Arkeon lungo il percorso della mia ricerca di me stesso, della lotta che conduco con me per conoscermi, sopraffarmi e arrendermi alla mia natura più autentica. E oggi non posso, proprio non posso, far finta di non essermi incontrato, di non aver conosciuto la mia storia, di non aver toccato la forza e la chiarezza delle mie aspirazioni and my identity. And then I can retire in good order, I can not say "it was great, thanks," I can not tell which one I attended was a dangerous path, that the depths of my soul and touch others were misleading, that the great was born there or has been consolidated (love, children, friends) are not protected and nourished by that space.
I can not do stupid not to go to war.
agree indeed, according to the rule that I have known and accepted in the work of Arkeon as a rule the soul and life, that what happened is the natural continuation of work on me and on my life. My teacher is no longer but Vito The Vito Tinelli ... and as rightly said, the best teachers are always the assholes (in the archetypal sense, I mean). There are "intensive and chairs" that apply in the morning saying that I left my wife to stay calm when the police came without knowing why, or the day I arrived in office after a transmission of the Strip and a call made me afraid of the CEO have lost their jobs without knowing why, or night I called to tell me that one of his friends had lost their jobs, that one had attempted suicide, one that had failed to keep the family together and all this c ' was a reason.
And then, thinking Ambrosoli to Falcone, Marco Biagi, a Calabrian, or the many other civilian heroes of our country, I am convinced that their choice was not dictated by "morality." I think it was simply the only way that they honor themselves, their history and their future. As for
Arkeon and what Peter called "the silence of the honest " I agree that perpetrated on us is a form of abuse perpetrated on the media plan and the judiciary, which is undermining the sense of 'authority and truth. But I also believe that the real abuse, the most dramatic, is the one perpetrated on the level of individual lives, and undermined the authority and truth are the ones within, as show examples of some posthumous revisionism about their lives, so years of existence, wives, children, work and friends become in just two years of top-down media campaign: this is a drastic change in those normally given to mental manipulation sectarian. But - to be clear - I also believe that before these three abuses, and especially the third, there is a liability to suffer it. What Peter finely calls " the act that is not the answer that I could not give, earlier in my life, the face of injustice" and that S & P calls in a more explicit "the silence of Paraculo .
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Monday, May 18, 2009
Where To Buy Matula Tea Store
The case Arkeon - new site
Among the comments last post I have received reports of a new website, entitled "ilcasoarkeon" referred here willingly carried over the link and I add in my blogroll.
http://ilcasoarkeon.wordpress.com/
Among the comments last post I have received reports of a new website, entitled "ilcasoarkeon" referred here willingly carried over the link and I add in my blogroll.
http://ilcasoarkeon.wordpress.com/
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Cake Dirt Bike Tracks
The Discreet Charm of the plumber
This morning my wife showed me a promotional blurb on the magazine of the supermarket, where he was promoting a service of "husbands for rent." Quote the ad said: " a service that offers help to all the families and wives who can not count on her husband for committees and house chores. You have to renew the letters of the car? Mow the garden? Accompany children to the game? Do not worry if your partner is overwhelmed by work or prefer to play soccer with friends: her husband rent solve all your problems ... a good opportunity for the wives and even husbands! "
not discuss the merits of the service, which is certainly a worthy legittimissima and commercial initiative, but the value of "symbolic", the "unspoken" which seems to me to express.
The short article is aimed at women in fact tired of the fact that " can not count on your husband for house chores " why " prefer to play soccer with friends ! The items are stones and do not think of adding me if I say that seems to feel (though not written) that "even" for odd jobs. And the proof is that the proposed solution is " rent a husband." Not a "pet rent", a "factotum", but "a husband."
According to the blurb, in essence, these women are not only tired of having to do everything themselves, but are tired of not having a husband by side, one that devolved to this company's services is not only the provision of additional time and skills to the need for home, but also and perhaps especially the compensation of a void, a loneliness. It is not the time of her husband's missing is the his presence, his support, his reliability. He played football!
Sure there are men of this kind. I remember that even in the seminaries of Arkeon you mentioned the football team as a tool type used by some men to escape the intimacy and the responsibility of the couple relationship and at the same time to defend themselves from intimacy with the men through a relationship that most adult goliardic . Two birds with one stone. But in
seminars Arkeon the finger was put on the wound to show and why people would take responsibility to heal, to make a leap forward in intimacy, starting from the shared sense of absence and distance to reach everyone to choose to "return to self": that man not only his wife was missing, but also to himself. And the same was true in other cases from the inverse for his wife.
But here the wife has resigned and choose - bea (or) treatment happy - to solve all the rent with her husband. And the opportunity, the paragraph makes clear, it is also good for their husbands, so they can continue to play soccer or be overwhelmed by work. Basically you pay to go on living happy and (s) happy.
It makes me think hard about that article a couple of years ago that appeared in the Republic, according to which the statistics of a classic American university showed that couples who live far last longer!
This morning my wife showed me a promotional blurb on the magazine of the supermarket, where he was promoting a service of "husbands for rent." Quote the ad said: " a service that offers help to all the families and wives who can not count on her husband for committees and house chores. You have to renew the letters of the car? Mow the garden? Accompany children to the game? Do not worry if your partner is overwhelmed by work or prefer to play soccer with friends: her husband rent solve all your problems ... a good opportunity for the wives and even husbands! "
not discuss the merits of the service, which is certainly a worthy legittimissima and commercial initiative, but the value of "symbolic", the "unspoken" which seems to me to express.
The short article is aimed at women in fact tired of the fact that " can not count on your husband for house chores " why " prefer to play soccer with friends ! The items are stones and do not think of adding me if I say that seems to feel (though not written) that "even" for odd jobs. And the proof is that the proposed solution is " rent a husband." Not a "pet rent", a "factotum", but "a husband."
According to the blurb, in essence, these women are not only tired of having to do everything themselves, but are tired of not having a husband by side, one that devolved to this company's services is not only the provision of additional time and skills to the need for home, but also and perhaps especially the compensation of a void, a loneliness. It is not the time of her husband's missing is the his presence, his support, his reliability. He played football!
Sure there are men of this kind. I remember that even in the seminaries of Arkeon you mentioned the football team as a tool type used by some men to escape the intimacy and the responsibility of the couple relationship and at the same time to defend themselves from intimacy with the men through a relationship that most adult goliardic . Two birds with one stone. But in
seminars Arkeon the finger was put on the wound to show and why people would take responsibility to heal, to make a leap forward in intimacy, starting from the shared sense of absence and distance to reach everyone to choose to "return to self": that man not only his wife was missing, but also to himself. And the same was true in other cases from the inverse for his wife.
But here the wife has resigned and choose - bea (or) treatment happy - to solve all the rent with her husband. And the opportunity, the paragraph makes clear, it is also good for their husbands, so they can continue to play soccer or be overwhelmed by work. Basically you pay to go on living happy and (s) happy.
It makes me think hard about that article a couple of years ago that appeared in the Republic, according to which the statistics of a classic American university showed that couples who live far last longer!
Monday, May 11, 2009
I Have A Fascination With My Bfs Testicles
Style is everything in life
Today the site of Cesap I found the following ad, titled "Intimidation .
"In recent months some people have already reported to the court, by means of warnings, blogs, letters trying to intimidate and impede the activities of Dr. Tinelli and CESAP. These modes of action have been reported to authorities immediately authorities. As soon as possible publish the names of those who organized this campaign of intimidation and vilification.
The Office "
I must say that I truly understand who it refers: the talk Tinelli many blogs, critics on his work but very different from each other, some throwing insults and defamation (as it does on ADUC) and other leading information and reasoned argument. Which of these would be the intimidating and interfering is not given to understand.
At this point, fortunately, I reassured the press: the names will be published "as soon as possible." But at this point I do not understand what the purpose of such a statement. If the names of these people, "which is already reported to the judicial authorities," will be made "as soon as possible," what the press is talking to me? Why not wait to say what can not say when he can say? It seems a little 'convoluted to me!
Hard to escape the doubt that the title of the press does not refer to its content but its purpose!
And last, but this is just one fixed my formal, it is surprising that a press of this relief has been given to the signing of the Secretariat and the Steering Committee or the Presidency. It 's true that in many organizations, especially smaller ones who live the commitment and dedication of a few people, the same person often plays multiple roles ... but if you give them UNPO, roles, you might as well stick to them, no ?
Today the site of Cesap I found the following ad, titled "Intimidation .
"In recent months some people have already reported to the court, by means of warnings, blogs, letters trying to intimidate and impede the activities of Dr. Tinelli and CESAP. These modes of action have been reported to authorities immediately authorities. As soon as possible publish the names of those who organized this campaign of intimidation and vilification.
The Office "
I must say that I truly understand who it refers: the talk Tinelli many blogs, critics on his work but very different from each other, some throwing insults and defamation (as it does on ADUC) and other leading information and reasoned argument. Which of these would be the intimidating and interfering is not given to understand.
At this point, fortunately, I reassured the press: the names will be published "as soon as possible." But at this point I do not understand what the purpose of such a statement. If the names of these people, "which is already reported to the judicial authorities," will be made "as soon as possible," what the press is talking to me? Why not wait to say what can not say when he can say? It seems a little 'convoluted to me!
Hard to escape the doubt that the title of the press does not refer to its content but its purpose!
And last, but this is just one fixed my formal, it is surprising that a press of this relief has been given to the signing of the Secretariat and the Steering Committee or the Presidency. It 's true that in many organizations, especially smaller ones who live the commitment and dedication of a few people, the same person often plays multiple roles ... but if you give them UNPO, roles, you might as well stick to them, no ?
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Pogo Single Deck Pinochle
The blame is always out of me I carry the fire
"There he is!" I said. Berlusconi to what the wife says "To have plagiarized." The words were not those, but the meaning was exactly that.
And he says almost unaware (or unconcerned) that the idea of \u200b\u200ba wife who, after thirty years of marriage and four children, asks for divorce for the suggestion of the opposition is perhaps a little 'grotesque. Unaware (or unconcerned) that, describing his wife as a woman who after thirty years of marriage and four children to be dictated by others ideas on her husband, in fact, describes a woman of little value, a silly little woman, unaware of himself. But mostly unaware (or unconcerned) that those words returned - much of what his wife - the reality of an infinite distance between the two: perhaps not a bitter outburst of jealousy, however, a possible sign of residual heat or pride, but a cold stored to a woman who sees and knows now by having so little to suggest to others the nature of her husband.
I read the words of Berlusconi and to think about the families on TV have reported the plagiarism of their children in Arkeon. No different from families who say "it's all because of that there" is guilty of bad companies "etc etc ... Families who do not want to contemplate the possibility of a choice by their children's different from what they would do. Families who pretend not to know that if these children were so influenced by the first comer, they could have in twenty years influenzare ben di più. Ma soprattutto famiglie pronte a sacrificare la dignità dei propri figli sull’altare delle proprie convinzioni, trasformandoli dai figli modello a delle persone deboli e plagiabili non appena questi prendano strade a loro inconcepibili. Un fatto che – come nel caso di Berlusconi – denuncia una distanza tra le persone maggiore di quella che esse vorrebbero vedere e fa capire da dove possano nascere improvvisamente le incomprensioni o i conflitti tra persone prima vicine.
"There he is!" I said. Berlusconi to what the wife says "To have plagiarized." The words were not those, but the meaning was exactly that.
And he says almost unaware (or unconcerned) that the idea of \u200b\u200ba wife who, after thirty years of marriage and four children, asks for divorce for the suggestion of the opposition is perhaps a little 'grotesque. Unaware (or unconcerned) that, describing his wife as a woman who after thirty years of marriage and four children to be dictated by others ideas on her husband, in fact, describes a woman of little value, a silly little woman, unaware of himself. But mostly unaware (or unconcerned) that those words returned - much of what his wife - the reality of an infinite distance between the two: perhaps not a bitter outburst of jealousy, however, a possible sign of residual heat or pride, but a cold stored to a woman who sees and knows now by having so little to suggest to others the nature of her husband.
I read the words of Berlusconi and to think about the families on TV have reported the plagiarism of their children in Arkeon. No different from families who say "it's all because of that there" is guilty of bad companies "etc etc ... Families who do not want to contemplate the possibility of a choice by their children's different from what they would do. Families who pretend not to know that if these children were so influenced by the first comer, they could have in twenty years influenzare ben di più. Ma soprattutto famiglie pronte a sacrificare la dignità dei propri figli sull’altare delle proprie convinzioni, trasformandoli dai figli modello a delle persone deboli e plagiabili non appena questi prendano strade a loro inconcepibili. Un fatto che – come nel caso di Berlusconi – denuncia una distanza tra le persone maggiore di quella che esse vorrebbero vedere e fa capire da dove possano nascere improvvisamente le incomprensioni o i conflitti tra persone prima vicine.
Monday, May 4, 2009
How Many Days Off For Pneumonia
La conclusione del mio ultimo post mi ha fatto ripensare a un libro che ho letto recentemente “La strada” di Cormac McCarthy. E’ la storia apparentemente disperata di un padre e un figlio sopravvissuti a un nuclear holocaust, wandering in search of survival. And the father - which, unlike the child has experienced the world "first" - he always says to his son " we bring the fire." With this - I understand - means a condition that becomes almost a responsibility that we are, we need to do this, despite the circumstances.
The story, again, is desperate than the common sense of what can be hope. Yet it is not hopeless. The finish shows a possibility that is not a happy ending, which is not a hope, but that makes sense. A possible way of things. That sense that - but here it is I who speak, do not McCarthy - it's like the rug from below is pure chaos, seen from above shows a drawing, you must go and see it through, without claiming to understand it before. They call it faith.
Recently I read another book by McCarthy, "Sunset Limited". Unlike "La Strada", a book is at times hilarious, grotesque, theatrical. Yet it shares the same pattern: white / black. life / death, compared to the extremes without any setting, without narration, the reduction of life to its extremes. What I find great in this author, although of a magnitude difficult to match, has the deepest respect for reality and for the man, in all its possible and contradictory expressions. In his book eschews any temptation to respond. To indicate a way out, or her choice. Tile two alterative and shows the grim immediacy of the truth. On the one hand, the lack of meaning. The other the possibility of an effect, never said, never read, but felt, intuited, something I can not explain if you do not like my experience of the Eucharist, which I take every Sunday for years without being able to understand the meaning, while without being able to live out the depth, but I feel I can not give it up without losing something.
other words, offers no answers - that videntemene did not - but his questions. This, to me, è un maestro. E un uomo.
Allora a chi piace consiglio:
- Cormac McCarthy, 2006, “Sunset limited”, Einaudi, 10 € (si legge in un’oretta)
- Cormac McCarthy, 2006, “La strada”, Einaudi, 17 €
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)