covers institutional self-seeking few days ago I read a book by Vito Mancuso, a Catholic theologian who explained (well known) as Catholicism is considered dall’ebraismo una setta e (cosa a me non nota) come i libri dell’Antico Testamento successivi al Deuteronomio (in sostanza larga parte dei libri sapienziali come il Siracide) non siano da essi riconosciuti, bensì considerati “apocrifi”. Fa strano pensare che per molti ebrei questi libri, che da noi sono considerati appunto “sapienziali”, per il solo fatto di essere definiti apocrifi sono probabilmente sconosciuti e circondati da un alone di mistero e perversione, più o meno come per noi sono oggi i vangeli apocrifi del Mar Morto e in particolare il bellissimo Vangelo di Tommaso! E’ sempre interessante mettersi nei pani degli altri per guardarci!
Ho parlato di questo perché spesso, in our newspapers or broadcasts in some depth, we talk about the trend - in our post-modern - the return of the religious, particularly the religious irrational and even more particularly of a religious cult. The sect has arrived! The most common example is Scientology, but in milder forms, there are also the New Age movement, and even according to some strong spread of charismatic groups within the Catholic Church itself (Neocatechumenal, renewed in spirit, etc.).
It is now clear that in some cases the label of religious movement is a tactical device to circumvent possible charges of crimes of various kinds: in this sense, as I understand, the "religious turn" of Scientology is emblematic. But certainly in many other cases, the spread of new forms of religiosity is a response to a search for meaning that increases with increasing fragmentation of our society and its traditional institutions (family, party, nation).
Personally I have known several people that live some of these experiences: Reiki, Jehovah's Witnesses, Neocatechumenal, renewed in spirit ... I've seen the rites and forms and sometimes left me truly puzzled the exasperation, the strong emotional involvement collective in which it is unclear how individual persons and as actors are imitators aware, mystical forms at or beyond the superstition ... but this is my personal assessments: and in any case I never saw pressures or influences on individuals worse than those that are usually conducted in many Catholic families healthy - with as many other instruments - are putting pressure on their children to address the educational choices, love, work and life. In short, everything in the boundary of free will and individual responsibility.
Yet I can not see that, for groups I mentioned, which are very "quiet", you are wasting at different levels accusations of plagiarism, sectarianism, manipulation, coercion, etc etc ... .. The actions against these groups reported Site Cesap of - for example the headline for some time, "revealed the abuses of the Neocatechumenal" without clarifying that it is an abuse of the liturgical form of sexual violence and not (!) - are just one of many examples and not necessarily the most vile [Please
read my comment at the bottom of the post in partial correction ].
Unfortunately these hostilities, which sometimes take the form of real paranoid obsessions, are not the result of a few people or a few groups "Saving Silverman". There is a growing climate of suspicion and intolerance towards new forms of religious or para-religious, as confirmed by many statements to that effect
Council of Europe and European Court of Human Rights , who on several occasions reiterated the demand for European governments to proceed with caution laws "anti cult or prevention campaigns against" new religious groups ", seeing in this clear case of violation of principles of freedom of religion and belief enshrined in the Charter of Human Rights.
In this Italy is no different from other countries. Bills to reinstate offenses of plagiarism are constantly recur for years in Parliament and what is worrying is that their proponents in civil society are usually devoid of any anti-cult groups that are distinguished scientific accreditation for fierce criticism of the most diverse groups, from Satanists to be renewed in spirit. But above all it is striking that - in a large reduction of the security forces despite the often-trumpeted security crisis - the state has seen fit to create a special Team Anti Sette (SAS), with a choice as early as the name evokes concern, both in light of the appeal of the European Court not to use the term cult in a timely, both in light of the choices of a subject as the same GRIS (the famous Catholic anti-cult research group) over the years has seen fit to change the name from Research Group Seven Group for Research and Information Socioreligiosa.
In this context, which until not long ago I was totally unknown, it makes clear the development of the case Arkeon, who is there to show how prejudice leads to seven seen everywhere and force the hand in the name of the greater good represented by their defeat. Without rehashing the now infamous history (following the reports of some former members and a small anti-cult association Puglia, investigations have been launched on some of the masters Arkeon method, was suspended the activities of the workshops and now expects a Arkeon Decision of the Court of Bari on the possible opening of a trial of suspects) what strikes me is that, three years after the beginning of this surreal affair, has not yet figured out if some people are under investigation for specific behavior or is the accused as such the method Arkeon.
The logic would lead me to say the first one: you can not - I know - a method acknowledge as such, as this would be tantamount to holding illegal ideas. Sure you can say that conduct is unlawful and, therefore, a method that is unlawful insofar as and until it implements this behavior: if such conduct were not, there would be no problem. With specific regard to allegations made to suspects (abuse of the psychological profession, practicing medicine, then a result of domestic violence and fraud and the Association conspiracy), Arkeon is therefore unlawful only to the extent that:
- promised to cure ills (or limited to those who promise healing from Mali);
- was a psychological method and was carried out by persons not registered in the psychologists;
- commit violence in its context, private (or limited to those who commit violence).
Consequently and conversely this means that the exercise of lawful Arkeon would rather for those who do not make violence that promises healing or that - if it were defined Arkeon psychotherapy - to exercise were registered as psychologists. In
effects of different active teachers only a few have been investigated. One can interpret this as a confirmation that is not in question Arkeon but the way in which some teachers - including also the founder - have exercised? If so, it would mean that tomorrow these other teachers could safely return to their seminars.
Unfortunately, it is clear to everyone that it is not.
simply have not found witnesses against the other masters.
The truth is that, in fact even if not in law, is under indictment Arkeon as psycho!
And the rest is clear that the very use of the term of a psycho is no longer necessary to proceed to a court challenge the offenses alleged, which shows that under discussion are not behaviors but an idea.
I say - for that matter - the comments on the site of the two main witnesses Cesap (Charles and Lela), as well as those of Dr. Tinelli and other foristi, blaming not only individuals but the method as such, dangerous in their re-release of psychotherapy crazy Singer. They say the allegations of Digos in the famous press conference of 2007, as well as indictments of the prosecution against the suspects and DiMarzio.Lo says the fact that in this matter is on the newly formed Anti Team Seven (SAS).
This is disturbing. Why do not you understand
on what basis has estimated that the PM had Arkeon psychotherapy, it is not his responsibility to judge what is and what is not psychotherapy (and in this respect is legitimate to ask who the expert psychologist whose expertise is based on this view and call into question the competence and reliability, especially if it were Tinelli and his infamous studio decennial never seen anyone to date there is no public document of Tinelli that can demonstrate that it - as to the actual skills - is something more than a degree in very interested in the psychology of judicial reporting).
because it violates the most basic principles of the rule of law, establishing a de facto presumption of regardless of guilt. And here there is an injury as big as a house is shown by the fact that the same prosecutors have never named - in what is known - the accused to ask for their account of the facts, as shown by the statements recently given on the website "The case Arkeon "Piero - who says he does not even know what to suspect (and it is not the only one).
Against all this there is a question that I pose for some time.
How is it possible that I can not experience that love making me a seminar Arkeon with whom, and only people like me who loves the experience, without harming anyone? How can the
constant race to the protection of the individual through the creation of new registers and codes can always overwhelm the individual's freedom to live how he wants the same peer? How can two adults can do together voluntarily pay extreme sex without violence or exploitation of prostitution, but I can not pay to participate in a seminar that I like? Why
psychology tells us to do his job?
And who says what is psychology?
O psychologist?
But if I ask the landlord how the wine will say that certainly is delicious. In fact it tells me that "councelor" - which does a job very similar to the psychologist psychologist but is not, and that such seminars could Arkeon - is incompetent, is a creep in disguise, is the antechamber of the scam.
How can we not see that there is an essence of human experience and puts that in the categories of psychology, religion, etc. .. and that is simply self-seeking everyone how the hell they like?
