Riprendo dove interrotto l'ultimo post, venendo all’esegesi del “pensiero di Bellu”.
Il primo articolo pubblicato dall'Unità (“
Da predicatore Vaticano e supporter di Arkeon ”) riprende sostanzialmente il presunto scoop fatto nel dicembre 2007 da “Striscia la Notizia”, che parlò delle due trasmissioni di “A sua immagine” in cui P.Cantalamessa aveva intervistato prima Moccia nell’ambito di una puntata dedicata al tema del figliol prodigo (11/09/04) e poi una giovane coppia di Arkeon nell’ambito di una puntata dedicata al tema della famiglia (30/12/2006). L’unica novità introdotta Article is a reference to the letters sent to Father Cantalamessa on the family of followers of Arkeon worried about their relatives, according to the U.S. shows that the uncritical support of Father Cantalamessa Arkeon and to his close relationship with Moccia. Proceed by including the most important phrases and commenting.
1.
"The preacher dedicated an episode of her television program (..) method Arkeon and conducts an interview with laudatory Moccia on the father-son" . Just see it to verify that the episode is dedicated to Arkeon (never mentioned), but the father-son relationship in the transmission. And the interview is not laudatory, but reflects trivially interest and appreciation for the interviewer who called the experience of the interviewee (and who does not find a positive story about a son who returns to her father after years of conflict relationship?).
2.
"A month later in Milan, in the church of S. Eustorgio, celebrates a Mass at which assist Vito Carlo Moccia and hundreds of his disciples. " A Mass is a public which anyone can take part: the same as explained Cantalamessa in his letter to the Unity
, "I celebrated Mass for them. They asked me to participate in a Mass celebrated for the parish of St. Eustorgio and were received by me and the parish priest. They were all built in 400 and have, many have confessed, and many received communion. " The fact of us then met in the sacristy after the celebration seems a fairly obvious when you find an organized group of perhaps two hundred people who came to assist. In this respect, writes an eye-witness, the
Pulvis blogger: "I remember we went into the sacristy for the priest, very hospitable, seeing a group of parishioners is not large enough, allowed us to see the beauty there and kept in rooms adjacent to the church . Point. Father Cantalamessa
himself in the face of free events (in the sense of "not derived from any of its particular action") of affection toward her has done what he would do all priests (and any person with common sense) has not rejected the hard but has not in any way encouraged. " Lastly, the scene - reproduced photographically Unit - is not taken from a promotional CD as Bellu said, but a private video recorded at the time and seized by Digos. Add to sig.Bellu that many have spoken out of turn of "followers" of Arkeon, but he is now the first to have spoken to the disciples. Promoted on the field and alleged psycho religious group!
3.
"A campaign of proselytizing ever more intense: the number of recruits will come to tap the considerable amount of twenty thousand. " The campaign of proselytizing was then so intense that on average 20 people attended the seminars, alumni usual. The figure of 20,000 recruits already in the previous post I expressed myself.
4.
" The authenticity of these documents is certified. They were, in fact, produced by the legal Vito Carlo Moccia in support of a writ of summons against the Centre studies on psychological abuse ". It 's just not true. These documents were never produced by the defense, as will be occur when the cards will be made public. Being on the computer seized from Moccia, these data are in the hands of the Digos, the PM and perhaps Cesap. The question is how have come into the hands of the newspapers of the pleadings but investigative records confidential.
5. The lunge - and novelty - the stronger the article should be in two places. Where it says:
"The preacher of the Papal Household is not limited to defending the head of" Sacred path "but is careful to inform him of the complaint that was addressed confidentially. In the bottom of the letter is, in fact, a handwritten note: "Dear Vito, I send you a letter I received and my answer, because, I think, rightly informed '" . And then he says:
"Instead, there is (dated April 19, 2006) a letter, scritta dalla stessa città, di un signore che poi è il marito dell’amica disperata della signora di Magenta. Questo signore, al pari dei due figli, ha aderito ad Arkeon o, almeno, ce l’ha in grande simpatia. E fa riferimento al contenuto della lettera inviata a Cantalamessa dall’amica della moglie. Come è potuto succedere? L’unica spiegazione è che anche questa volta Moccia sia stato informato e che abbia chiesto all’adepto di Magenta di scrivere qualcosa di rassicurante all’autorevole sponsor cattolico” . Le riposte dello stesso
Cantalamessa sul punto sono assolutamente forti e chiare: “Numerose Associazioni, per i più svariati motivi, ricevono accuse e denuncie ed io pensavo che anche le accuse mosse ad Arkeon facessero parte di queste, proprio per questo motivo, avvisai Vito Carlo Moccia perché potesse rendersi conto di cosa stesse accadendo all’interno della sua Fondazione. Era sorta in me la convinzione che qualcuno dei “maestri” avesse abusato della fiducia di Vito Carlo Moccia, ma non pensavo alla negatività dell’ Associazione, perciò, in un’altra puntata della Rubrica religiosa “A sua Immagine”, intervistai una persona che aveva ricevuto dei benefici da Arkeon, ma volutamente non feci cenno alla suddetta Associazione, non per dare l’impressione di non conoscerla, come si insinua nell’articolo, ma proprio perché a me interessava solo the religious message and not to make propaganda Arkeon. ... personally I am not aware of any abuses that otherwise would have been the first to denounce and condemn: no complaint, if you are not witnesses, not only for having received two complaints letters ". Here also, I make my own the words of
Pulvis blogger who says: "I find that even with the disputed broadcasts has traveled his own way according to what his choice of life's demands: he took what was good and without advertising, he has shown and used it to explain and bring the Word of God ... And if what is written in the chart is true, have more than my estimate, not having seen the facts and having no interest or reason to believe one rather than the other party, put them in communication called off. As if to say: look at Vito Carlo Moccia that she is in good faith and try to see the critical aspects of his work to improve and grow in respect for others, here is someone who has something to say. Look lady, if his interest is really the good of the children of her friend, that's what it says their father (and you can not take it for granted that he has no good just because of the intellect thinks otherwise by yourself!). It 's a way of doing things infinitely wiser and more correct than that of those centers on the seven studies that instead of dialogue to bring the parties against each other systematically intensifying conflicts and folding events, the words and theories to their own use. It 'the same one that tried to implement the dott.sa Di Marzio asked to include in his study of the testimony Arkeon negative CESAP made to the province of Bari Unfortunately dott.sa Tinelli not agreed (I wonder why?) mix-and-shortly after the study of Di Marzio was blocked by a court case once again playing in Bari, absurd, probably mounted on artfully chissachì and (I hope and believe) fortunately now been completed. "
6. Finally, about the famous fake scoop of Striscia la Notizia Cantalemssa interviewed by the pair in the second transmission, the article reports that
"spoke the guarantor of privacy issue to the Rai and driver a warning for violating the ethical rules that protect children. The child of Luke was not only perfectly recognizable, but notes the guarantor, had to attend an interview which covered "even very sensitive issues related to painful experiences of a parent: the sexual abuse by a family member '" . At this point you made one of the most grotesque and absurd reversals of the truth. First, the movie was not a document promotion, as again he would have us believe, but confidential internal documents of the group, which means that the privacy violation was committed not by parents or by non Strip and Arkeon but only to the child but the family itself. As for the madness of discourse on the child forced to attend to the narrative of painful experiences, I wonder if the guarantor has before it the power to assess aspects of psychological, the ability to do so, but has seen the movie? He heard some form of violence or exasperation in the narrative of his father? You really believe that a narrative so calm and sincere in events may be more intense than many violent TV images, family quarrels, small school that daily attacks on one another? But what the hell we talking about? How is a child under the guarantee of three years whose parents are divorcing to explain that? They explain it to him by the sponsor to protect their privacy?
The second article of interest ("
Appraisal fee is how Sacred Path has sought to clean up " Bellu, 4/10/2010) adds a further novelty in the story Arkeon: a study mandated by the Arkeon
CISF ( International Centre for Family Studies) for the sum of € 30,000 and aimed - according to the author - to redo a Arkeon virginity to a scandal now up and running. The discourse on shooting more big hand in hand that raises the bar here a perfect fit.
1. The fundamental point has already been well commented on his blog from
Baraka, which I would like here to return to full
"Expertise in Payments, the latest article by Giovanni Maria Bellu, implies a curious idea of \u200b\u200bethics and professional profile of respected scholars. The idea that a respected and accredited scholars Research Center of international mercenaries are now suddenly so willing to sell a kilo its name on favorable evaluations to help clean up a gang of thugs. Amazing. Giovanni Maria Bellu if he wanted to do a little investigative journalism ' more serious and less superficial would first have to ask how can a simple balance expertise already existed and how it is possible that the prosecutors in Bari has not kept any account nor has felt the need to deepen. Especially would first have to wonder why a study that began in a totally free hand by Dr. Di Marzio Arkeon on the case was broken with blows of notices of investigation and darkening of the site. " 2. "
drafting of a" final report "cautiously favorable to the association. These ten short pages preceded by a warning that sounds like a get your hands on: "All material è stato fornito da Arkeon o è stato realizzato con il suo supporto tecnico” . Il CISF è un centro studi internazionalmente noto ed apprezzato, che vanta una notevole credibilità scientifica anche al di fuori degli ambienti cattolici. L’ipotesi più semplice che abbiano scritto quello che hanno visto è troppo semplice? L’ipotesi che 30.000 € siano troppo pochi per vendersi una reputazione è troppo semplice? Tra l’altro la cifra non fu neanche di 30.000 € ma di 10.000 €, perché lo studio fu interrotto ad un stadio intermedio.
3.
“La disponibilità e l’apertura totale dimostrate da tutte le persone di Arkeon implicate nella ricerca sono state pronte and total, and allowed to work quickly, and it seems to us, pay '. " A reader just even close to what the law realizes that this sentence clashes sharply with the typical features of a sect or a criminal association, which typically is quite closed to the outside. In fact the same Dr.Schimera of Digos di Bari, in his now famous interview in 2006 to "Earth" was justified for not having anyone in infiltrated Arkeon seminars to gather evidence citing the extreme end of these types of groups yet CISF get any points out that a "prompt and total openness." Again, the simplest answer is not it? Again they sold for € 10,000? Either explanation is that we presented to them "the dress of the party" to deceive and have a good study? In that case how to explain that the contents of the recordings of the seminars which assisted the scholars of the IFSC are the same as thousands of hours of recordings accumulated over many years with the consent of participants and provision of Digos?
4.
"It was then the judiciary to prevent the use of" . Again, the information is simply and completely false. The unit itself documents how the study was commissioned in the winter of 2006, one year before they were delivered and when security alerts so not yet had no news of the existence of ongoing investigations. Finally, the report in question was made available in the spring and summer of 2007, several months before delivery of a notice of guarantee. If at that time, which did the media campaign against Arkeon had already started, the study was not used as a certification is not authoritative for the prohibitions of the judiciary (which had not yet occurred), but because there was a contractual clause that prohibited the disclosure of study, which could then be used solely for internal self-assessment. For other things, this document was not produced by the defense and then there is among the papers of the process but only in the documentary material sequestrato dalla Digos a Moccia. E’ lecito domandarsi di nuovo come faccia ad essere entrato in possesso dell’Unità e per mano di chi?
5. Concludo citando il passaggio personale su Vito.
“Vito Carlo Moccia, che tra l’altro è anche accusato di esercizio abusivo della professione, veniva presentato come un genio pluridisciplinare universalmente conosciuto e stimato. Eccone un passo. «Un tempo Vito Carlo era imprenditore nel campo della bioingegneria, realizzato economicamente e riconosciuto nel mondo. Anni fa anch’egli scendeva nel “proprio inferno” prendendo coscienza della solitudine esistenziale che lo investiva. Andò alla ricerca di risposte nelle vie intellettuali, si laureò in antropologia and psychology, he sought the paths and psychoanalytic psychotherapy, in Eastern traditions, the practice of meditation, to find its way back to his father. " An identikit that stride so left with what we read in the decree of trial, "the snot was as a graduate of the University of San Diego and La Jolla degree in psychology and pedagogy at the State University of Rijeka, but not non-existent titles valid in Italy ". I cite this passage not so much to correct the falsification that contains (Moccia had actually based biomedical company that is easy to check the sales and penetration, and had actually achieved the titles mentioned by the same unit, riconosciuti o meno che fossero in Italia), ma per sottolineare che dire che la prima descrizione “stride in modo sinistro” con la seconda è veramente un’esagerazione meschina. In questi anni ci siamo abituati ai tentativi di denigrazione portati dalla Tinelli ai curriculum di colleghi più apprezzati…ma da un giornalista a un inquisito è una roba davvero un po’meschina!
Prima di chiudere vorrei richiamare l’attenzione su un interessante documento riportato da Bellu: una tabella intitolata ”Uscite” che riporta dei costi relativi agli anni 2006-2009. Si tratta di una previsione di spesa dell’Associazione Sacred Path per i quattro anni successivi. Che sia una previsione e non un consuntivo the show is the fact that the figure reported for the CISF is 30,000 €, and as I said and as confirmed by the CISF was subsequently paid the amount of only € 10,000, and the fact that the activity of the seminars was interrupted with alerts Guarantee of 2007. Having that data, I imagine that Mr Bellu has also tables of twins "Enter." If he had the pleasure of looking at them and compare them would porbabilmnente discovered the hot water was an association that is that Sacred Path microscopic loss in dry years. In the face of the association to commit a crime.
